Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for theoretical computer scientists and researchers in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What if anything is known about the parameterized complexity of computing the intersection number of a graph (the smallest number of cliques needed to cover all its edges)?

It has long been known to be NP-complete, and it's obviously FPT because it has a kernel: if you can cover a graph with $k$ cliques then there are at most $2^k$ different closed neighborhoods of vertices (two vertices have the same neighborhoods if they belong to the same set of cliques), and you might as well keep only one vertex per neighborhood. Is this observation in the literature somewhere? What kind of dependence on $k$ is known?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 16 down vote accepted

The problem has been studied under the name Edge Clique Cover, and the observations you make regarding data reduction have been used to get a kernel with 2^k vertices. It is a long standing open problem whether a polynomial kernel exists. I don't know about good bounds on the running time, see

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks! Exactly what I was looking for. – David Eppstein Mar 5 '11 at 15:49
Evidently a polynomial kernel is infeasible, according to some fairly recent developments: – Neeldhara Nov 16 '11 at 12:24

Answering my own question, there's now a preprint on arXiv showing that double-exponential is the correct dependence, assuming the exponential time hypothesis. See "Known algorithms for EDGE CLIQUE COVER are probably optimal", Marek Cygan, Marcin Pilipczuk, and Michał Pilipczuk, arXiv:1203.1754 and SODA 2013

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.