My understanding of the Church-Turing thesis is the: It puts a limit on what can be computed by any discrete and finite process. Although still a thesis, not a theorem, if it were to be disproven, ...
I was having a discussion with a friend recently (who is an advocate of strongly typed languages). He made the comment: The inventors of Lambda Calculus always intended it to be typed. Now we ...
The Church-Turing thesis postulates that essentially all models of computation -Turing machines, Post systems, lambda-definability etc yield the same class of computable functions. Now we can think of ...
This may be a naive question, but here goes. (Edit -- it is not getting upvotes, but nobody has offered a response either; perhaps the question is more difficult, obscure, or unclear than I thought?) ...
Paul Wegner and Dina Goldin have for over a decade been publishing papers and books arguing primarily that the Church-Turing thesis is often misrepresented in the CS Theory community and elsewhere. ...
Consider an FSM and a finite set of variables. The FSM has the special property that each state contains a set of commands, with each command taking the form of "variable = expr(variable, ...)" e.g., ...
One of the most discussed questions on the site has been What it Would Mean to Disprove the Church-Turing Thesis. This is partly because Dershowitz and Gurevich published a proof of the Church-Turing ...