Timeline for A question on linear extensions of partial orders
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2, 2012 at 7:44 | history | edited | Kaveh |
edited tags
|
|
Jun 29, 2012 at 22:35 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCSTheory/status/218835003998609408 | ||
Jun 29, 2012 at 20:41 | comment | added | Suresh Venkat | In my variation each subsequence has length exactly 4, so Yury's answer kicks in. My only hope at this point is that the subsequences have very special structure and are related to each other, so maybe something specific to the problem would help. But there's no general hammer. | |
Jun 29, 2012 at 20:40 | vote | accept | Suresh Venkat | ||
Jun 29, 2012 at 19:56 | comment | added | Chandra Chekuri | You are right of course, me not thinking straight. | |
Jun 29, 2012 at 19:52 | comment | added | David Eppstein | Er, every undirected graph can be oriented to be a DAG. Just choose an ordering of the vertices and use that ordering to orient the edges. | |
Jun 29, 2012 at 19:51 | answer | added | Yury | timeline score: 14 | |
Jun 29, 2012 at 19:32 | comment | added | Chandra Chekuri | If each of the sequences are of length $2$ then one can think of each sequence as an undirected edge and we are asking whether an undirected graph can be oriented to be a DAG - iff if there is no cycle. But a greedy algorithm also works. Start with an edge and orient it arbitrarily and keep going as long as you can and if you get stuck you know it is not possible. Did you try that for your variation? Seems like it may work. | |
Jun 29, 2012 at 19:16 | history | asked | Suresh Venkat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |