Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 23, 2023 at 19:23 answer added John Tromp timeline score: 7
Oct 11, 2022 at 6:34 comment added user76284 @JoshuaHerman Here, size = abstractions + applications.
Jan 2, 2021 at 6:31 comment added user76284 @PeterTaylor Craig's theorem implies that any universal combinator must be improper.
Oct 20, 2019 at 23:24 history edited user76284 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 62 characters in body
Nov 16, 2017 at 10:47 comment added Peter Taylor How strictly are you defining "combinator"? Does it have to be of the form λx*.E where E is abstraction-free?
Nov 15, 2017 at 8:57 comment added Emil Jeřábek Your recent edit rather sounds like a (partial) answer.
Nov 15, 2017 at 4:47 history edited user76284 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 74 characters in body
Aug 10, 2017 at 18:48 comment added Noam Zeilberger Since 6 + 2 = 8 < 11, this makes me wonder whether {S,K} is the smallest basis of combinators measured by total size?
Aug 9, 2017 at 19:49 history edited user76284 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 100 characters in body
Jul 23, 2015 at 16:25 history edited user76284 CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
Jul 6, 2015 at 14:56 answer added cody timeline score: 10
Jul 6, 2015 at 10:49 comment added Joshua Herman What is your definition of size? Can you write it as a function?
Jul 6, 2015 at 0:26 answer added Joshua Herman timeline score: 8
Jul 2, 2015 at 16:12 comment added Andrej Bauer Maybe this is of interest: wolframscience.com/nksonline/page-1123a-text?firstview=1
Jul 2, 2015 at 4:05 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackCSTheory/status/616457587425431552
Jul 1, 2015 at 19:26 review First posts
Jul 2, 2015 at 7:56
Jul 1, 2015 at 19:23 history asked user76284 CC BY-SA 3.0