Return to Question

Anyone has proved the error rate of quantum computation is bounded by (less than) a constant rather than a function dependent on time and environment by quantum theory? For error rate and error correction of quantum computer, see Peter Shor.

I think assumptions to estimate error of quantum computation may be too simple to be practical or true, the quantum computation then has to be just a theoretical computational model.

Excuse me for posting such a question closely related to quantum theory, since physicists on physics.exchange have prohibited me from posting any suspicion about quantum computer, :D

UPDATE: Threshold theorem has to be proved with assumptions that is consistent to physics law, especially consistent to QFT, since there are fundamental obstacles to implementing scalable quantum computer; if we are unable to do so, I think we have to try to solve problem in another direction， the opposite direction, that is, trying to refute them (The assumptions infering scalable quantum computer) by physics theory.

Anyone has proved the error rate of quantum computation is bounded by (less than) a constant rather than a function dependent on time and environment by quantum theory? For error rate and error correction of quantum computer, see Peter Shor.

I think assumptions to estimate error of quantum computation may be too simple to be practical or true, the quantum computation then has to be just a theoretical computational model.

Excuse me for posting such a question closely related to quantum theory, since physicists on physics.exchange have prohibited me from posting any suspicion about quantum computer, :D

UPDATE: Threshold theorem has to be proved with assumptions that is consistent to physics law, especially consistent to QFT, since there are fundamental obstacles to implementing scalable quantum computer; if we are unable to do so, I think we have to try to solve problem in another direction， the opposite direction, that is, trying to refute them (The assumptions infering scalable quantum computer) by physics theory.

Anyone has proved the error rate of quantum computation is bounded by (less than) a constant rather than a function dependent on time and environment by quantum theory? For error rate and error correction of quantum computer, see Peter Shor.

I think assumptions to estimate error of quantum computation may be too simple to be practical or true, the quantum computation then has to be just a theoretical computational model.

Excuse me for posting such a question closely related to quantum theory, since physicists on physics.exchange have prohibited me from posting any suspicion about quantum computer, :D

UPDATE: Threshold theorem has to be proved with assumptions that is consistent to physics law,especially consistent to QFT, since there are fundamental obstacles to implementing scalable quantum computer; if we are unable to do so, I think we have to try to solve problem in another direction， the opposite direction, that is, trying to refute them (The assumptions infering scalable quantum computer) by physics theory.

Anyone has proved the error rate of quantum computation is bounded by (less than) a constant rather than a function dependent on time and environment by quantum theory? For error rate and error correction of quantum computer, see Peter Shor.

I think assumptions to estimate error of quantum computation may be too simple to be practical or true, the quantum computation then has to be just a theoretical computational model.

Excuse me for posting such a question closely related to quantum theory, since physicists on physics.exchange have prohibited me from posting any suspicion about quantum computer, :D

UPDATE: Threshold theorem has to be proved with assumptions that is consistent to physics law, especially consistent to QFT, since there are fundamental obstacles to implementing scalable quantum computer; if we are unable to do so, I think we have to try to solve problem in another direction， the opposite direction, that is, trying to refute them (The assumptions infering scalable quantum computer) by physics theory.

Anyone has proved the error rate of quantum computation is bounded by (less than) a constant rather than a function dependent on time and environment by quantum theory? For error rate and error correction of quantum computer, see Peter Shor.

I think assumptions to estimate error of quantum computation may be too simple to be practical or true, the quantum computation then has to be just a theoretical computational model.

Excuse me for posting such a question closely related to quantum theory, since physicists on physics.exchange have prohibited me from posting any suspicion about quantum computer, :D

UPDATE: Threshold theorem has to be proved with assumptions that is consistent to physics law,especially consistent to QFT, since there are fundamental obstacles to implementing scalable quantum computer; if we are unable to do so, I think we have to try to solve problem in another direction， the opposite direction, that is, trying to refute them (The assumptions infering threshold theorem) by physics theory.

Anyone has proved the error rate of quantum computation is bounded by (less than) a constant rather than a function dependent on time and environment by quantum theory? For error rate and error correction of quantum computer, see Peter Shor.

I think assumptions to estimate error of quantum computation may be too simple to be practical or true, the quantum computation then has to be just a theoretical computational model.

Excuse me for posting such a question closely related to quantum theory, since physicists on physics.exchange have prohibited me from posting any suspicion about quantum computer, :D

UPDATE: Threshold theorem has to be proved with assumptions that is consistent to physics law,especially consistent to QFT, since there are fundamental obstacles to implementing scalable quantum computer; if we are unable to do so, I think we have to try to solve problem in another direction， the opposite direction, that is, trying to refute them (The assumptions infering scalable quantum computer) by physics theory.