Skip to main content
4 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 3, 2011 at 23:33 comment added Tsuyoshi Ito The SHORT PROOFS problem in the paper is almost the same as the bounded halting problem. A reduction from the SHORT PROOFS problem would be most likely as messy as the typical proof of the NP-completeness of SAT, and therefore it is unlikely that the proof of the NP-completeness of this factor finding problem by Kilian constructs a reduction from the SHORT PROOFS problem directly.
Mar 2, 2011 at 17:47 comment added Marzio De Biasi @Marc ... mmm ... I think that it means: $\{\langle L, U, N \rangle \;|\; (\exists p \in \{L, \ldots, U\})[p | N]\}$ is NP-complete because a polynomial reduction from the NP-complete problem SHORT PROOF exists ...
Mar 2, 2011 at 15:53 comment added Marc Bury This is just another formulation that this problem is NP-complete.
Mar 1, 2011 at 21:09 history answered Marzio De Biasi CC BY-SA 2.5