Timeline for Difference between Strict Consistency and Sequential Consistency
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2011 at 10:25 | vote | accept | jetru | ||
| Apr 8, 2011 at 10:24 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Apr 8, 2011 at 14:57 | |||||
| Apr 8, 2011 at 10:16 | vote | accept | jetru | ||
| Apr 8, 2011 at 10:16 | |||||
| Apr 8, 2011 at 9:07 | comment | added | Sai Venkat | Yes.. If every process looks only at its local memory execution 2 is possible. In a properly sequential consistency the writes need not propagate instantly but when other location refer or update to the location written which is normally the case. | |
| Apr 8, 2011 at 8:16 | comment | added | jetru | So by considering memory updates propagation, I'm actually relaxing the memory model, hence in my imagined memory model, execution 2 is possible. In a properly sequentially consistent memory store, the writes would propagate instantly. Is this right? | |
| Apr 8, 2011 at 5:15 | history | answered | Sai Venkat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |