Timeline for Is the lower bound proof in this paper correct?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2010 at 23:27 | comment | added | Vinayak Pathak | @Robin: Interesting. Although I can't immediately see any relevance of any of these expressions to the problem at hand. | |
| Sep 1, 2010 at 6:58 | comment | added | Robin Kothari | @Casebash: Thanks. I didn't know Wolfram Alpha could do that. | |
| Sep 1, 2010 at 5:53 | comment | added | Casebash | @Robin: Look at possible closed forms: wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1.471299 | |
| Sep 1, 2010 at 2:43 | history | edited | Suresh Venkat |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 1, 2010 at 0:07 | comment | added | Robin Kothari | I tried to "reverse engineer" and figure out where the number 1.471299 comes from, but I had no luck. | |
| Aug 31, 2010 at 22:49 | vote | accept | Vinayak Pathak | ||
| Aug 31, 2010 at 20:52 | answer | added | David Eppstein | timeline score: 18 | |
| Aug 31, 2010 at 20:42 | history | asked | Vinayak Pathak | CC BY-SA 2.5 |