9
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathsf{ATISP}(f(n), g(n))$ be the class of languages decided by alternating Turing machines that halt in time $f(n)$ using space $g(n)$. Let $\mathsf{AALTSP}(f(n), g(n))$ be the class of languages decided by alternating Turing machines that halt using $f(n)$ alternations and space $g(n)$.

Ruzzo proved that $\mathsf{NC}^k = \mathsf{ATISP}(\log^k n, \log n)$. He also showed that $\mathsf{NC}^k \subseteq \mathsf{AALTSP}(\log^k n, \log n) \subseteq \mathsf{NC}^{k + 1}$.

Is $\mathsf{NC}^k = \mathsf{AALTSP}(\log^k n, \log n)$?

$\endgroup$
11
$\begingroup$

Of course the equalities and inclusions claimed in the question hold only for uniform $\mathsf{NC}^k$. The class $\mathsf{AALTSP}(\log^k n, \log n)$ is the same as uniform $\mathsf{AC}^k$, so the question is the same as whether $\mathsf{NC}^k = \mathsf{AC}^k$.

In particular the case $k=1$ implies that $\mathsf{L}$ is equal to $\mathsf{NL}$ and even $\mathsf{LogCFL}$, since $\mathsf{NC}^1 \subseteq \mathsf{L} \subseteq \mathsf{NL} \subseteq \mathsf{LogCFL} \subseteq \mathsf{AC}^1$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.