0
$\begingroup$

How can I construct a sorting network for $k$ numbers?

My goal is to implement sorting networks in Java for $k$ in the range $[3,\hspace{-0.03 in}32]$.
To be even more specific, I only want to sort integers.

I found some implementation in this article (pages 2-3), but I don't understand it.

I been trying to convert this problem to SAT. I started with a simple non-optimal network: $[01, 12, \ldots, (n-1)n, 01, 12, \ldots, (n-2)(n-1), \ldots, 01, 12, 01]$ (source). The idea is to convert it to SAT, find the shortest equal-satisfiable SAT formula, and convert it back to a network representation. The problem is that in the network, the order of comparisons is important, so I don't know hot to convert it to SAT. It sounds like some one has already been trying to do something like this, but I don't understand it completely.

Related question.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

there is some research angle here dating at least to Knuth's Art of Computer Programming and presumably earlier in finding optimal sorting networks for low $n$. its intractable to find optimal sorting networks for small $n$ but it has been done up to about $n=10$ eg as in this recent notable paper, also using SAT. details about how to reduce the problem to SAT are in the paper. basically a large SAT formula encoding is built that asserts "these boolean variables configure a circuit that sorts all inputs for size $n$". (the more nonresearch angle is to use existing sort algorithms or sorting network configurations as mentioned in the paper by Har-Peled you cite to generate the (nonoptimal) circuits, this is more like a CS/EE exercise.)

Optimal Sorting Networks Daniel Bundala, Jakub Závodný

This paper settles the optimality of sorting networks given in The Art of Computer Programming vol. 3 more than 40 years ago. The book lists efficient sorting networks with n <= 16 inputs. In this paper we give general combinatorial arguments showing that if a sorting network with a given depth exists then there exists one with a special form. We then construct propositional formulas whose satisfiability is necessary for the existence of such a network. Using a SAT solver we conclude that the listed networks have optimal depth. For n <= 10 inputs where optimality was known previously, our algorithm is four orders of magnitude faster than those in prior work.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Why the downvote?! $\endgroup$ – Mau Apr 2 '14 at 1:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.