I am not good at complexity, but got a possible relation between a plausible conjecture in graph theory and $coNP$.
Graph $G$ is Class 1 if it can be edge colored with $\Delta(G)$ colors, otherwise it is Class 2 and can be edge colored with $\Delta(G) + 1$ colors.
The Overfull conjecture (OC) asserts
A graph G with $\Delta (G) \geq n/3$ is class 2 if and only if it has an overfull subgraph $S$ such that $\displaystyle \Delta (G) = \Delta (S)$.
Assume OC and $\Delta (G) \geq n/3$.
This means that we have short certificate if $G$ is Class 1 or Class 2.
For Class 1 the certificate is $\Delta(G)$ edge coloring finding it is in $NP$.
For Class 2 the certificate is overfull subgraph $S$ such that $\displaystyle \Delta (G) = \Delta (S)$ and finding it is in $NP$.
This means there are no $coNP$-hard problems in this case.
There is a reduction from SAT to edge coloring $3$-regular graphs. Encoding unsatisfiable CNF to edge coloring is UNSAT and UNSAT is in $coNP$.
Question: Does the overfull conjecture and reduction from SAT to edge coloring $G$ with $\Delta (G) \geq n/3$ imply $NP=coNP$?
According to a paper edge coloring is NP-complete (possibly minor abuse of terminology) for $r$-regular graphs for any fixed $r \ge 3$ and it gives reduction of $G$ to $r$-regular $G'$.
Positive answer might help for counterexample to the overfull conjecture.
$\Delta(G)$ is the maximum degree and $n$ is the number of vertices.
EDIT Special cases of OC are proven.
According to Overfull Conjecture for Graphs with High Minimum Degree, Michael Plantholt:
we show that any (not necessarily regular) graph $G$ of even order $n$ that has sufficiently high minimum degree $\delta(G) \ge (\sqrt{7}/3) n$ has chromatic index equal to its maximum degree providing that $G$ does not contain an "overfull" subgraph, that is, a subgraph which trivially forces the chromatic index to be more than the maximum degree. This result thus verifies the Overfull Conjecture for graphs of even order and sufficiently high minimum degree.
EDIT 2 This paper p.2 might be related since it claims unless $NP=ZPP$, one can't approximate $\chi'(L^k(G))$ where $L^k(G)$ is the $k-th$ power of the line graph of $G$. (might be wrong on this since $\chi'$ is either $\Delta$ or $\Delta+1$).