10
$\begingroup$

Perhaps the main source of performance problems in Haskell is when a program inadvertently builds up a thunk of unbounded depth - this causes both a memory leak and a potential stack overflow when evaluating. The classic example is defining sum = foldr (+) 0 in Haskell.

Are there any type systems which statically enforce lack of such thunks in a program using a lazy language?

Seems like this should be on the same order of difficulty as proving other static program properties using type system extensions, e.g. some flavors of thread safety or memory safety.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Levy's call by push value calculus makes a distinction between values and their thunks. For a value v of type ty the computation thunk v has type U ty. Lindley and McBride's Frank language, inspired by CBPV, also makes this distinction between computations and values explicit, though unlike Haskell, Frank is strict.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.