What is an R-trivial language? What is an R-trivial monoid?

Context: Formal languages. Afaik, R-trivial languages is a subset of the starfree languages.

I mostly have background in formal languages and automata theory but not so much with the syntactic monoid characterization. So it would be nice to give a basic definition with maybe a small example of such a language.

(In order to support multiple QA-sites because I don't want to have any QA-site stay behind and to have that question also represented there, I have also posted this question on these other sites: stackoverflow.com, math.stackexchange.com, mathoverflow.net. In general I am against cross-posting but in this case, as they all have the same goal to be a complete reference of questions in the specific area, having the question cross posted is the best thing you can do.)


A semigroup $S$ is $R\text{-trivial}$ iff $a \: R \: b \Rightarrow a = b$ for all $a, b \in S$ where $R$ is Green's relation $a \: R \: b \Leftrightarrow aS^1 = bS^1$. The set of $R\text{-trivial}$ monoids forms a variety which can be ultimately defined by the equations $(xy)^n x = (xy)^n$.

A language is $R\text{-trivial}$ if its syntactic monoid is $R\text{-trivial}$. This variety of languages is alternatively defined as the set of all languages that can be written as a disjoint union of languages of the form $A_0^* a_1 A_1^* a_2 \ldots a_n A_n^*$ where $n \geq 0$, $a_1, \ldots, a_n \in A$, $A_i \subseteq A \setminus \{a_{i+1}\}$ for $0 \leq i \leq n-1$. Another definition given in [Pin], which I'm not familiar with, uses the so-called automates extensifs ("extensive automata"). You can find more results about those languages in [Pin]. There is an English version of this book, I've never read it but I'm pretty sure that you can find the same content.

For the sake of completeness, here is an example of an (artificial) $R\text{-trivial}$ language: $\{b\}^* a \{a,c\}^* b \{a\}^* b \{a,b,c\}^* \cup \{d\}^* \cup abcd$. You can build other examples with the previous definitions. Note that all of the properties of varieties of languages hold for $R\text{-trivial}$ languages, therefore they are closed under union, intersection and complementation. It should help to build more complicated languages.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the nice and detailed answer. That was exactly what I was searching for. $\endgroup$
    – Albert
    Dec 4 '10 at 17:19

Perhaps the Menagerie of Monoids diagram will be helpful?


from page 5, "On the Representation Theory of Finite J-trivial Monoids", by Denton, et. al. (2010).

A detailed description is also given in Section 2.1,

The smaller class of R-trivial monoids coincides with the class of so-called weakly ordered monoids as defined by Schocker [Sch08]. Also, via the right regular representation, any R-trivial monoid can be represented as a monoid of regressive functions on some finite poset P (a function f : P → P is called regressive if f(x) ≤ x for every x ∈ P); reciprocally any such monoid is R-trivial. We now present an example of a monoid which is R-trivial, but not J-trivial.

Example 2.3. Take the free left regular band B generated by two idempotents a,b. Multiplication is given by concatenation taking into account the idempotent relations, and then selecting only the two left factors (see for example [Sal07]). So B = {1,a,b,ab,ba} and 1B = B, aB = {a,ab}, bB = {b,ba}, abB = {ab}, and baB = {ba}. This shows that all R-classes consist of only one element and hence B is R-trivial. On the other hand, B is not L-trivial since {ab, ba} forms an L-class since b · ab = baanda·ba=ab. HenceBisalsonotJ-trivial.

  • $\begingroup$ 'menagerie of monoids' is just neat. $\endgroup$ Dec 3 '10 at 22:17
  • $\begingroup$ I find 'menagerie of monoids' mollitiously mirific! $\endgroup$ Dec 4 '10 at 2:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.