# obvious property of big O, big Omega, and big Theta [closed]

I'm trying to determine under what conditions the following statement is true.

The statement is, suppose $f(n) = O[g(n)]$ and $f(n) \neq \Theta[g(n)]$ then $g(n) = \Omega[f(n)]$

where $O$ means "asymptotically bounded above (not necessarily tightly) by", $\Omega$ means "asymptotically bounded below (not necessarily tightly) by" and $\Theta$ means "asymptotically bounded both above and below".

I can't seem to find it stated outright in any of the books or wikipedia articles.

I'm sure there are counterexamples where we can construct weird functions to contradict the statement, but I'm wondering whether the statement is true for all "ordinary" functions we "typically" encounter (of course, it would be necessary to rigorously define "ordinary" here).

• What definitions are you using for $O$, $\Theta$, and $\Omega$? – usul Sep 5 '16 at 17:52
• For example, what about $f(n) = 0$ if $n$ is odd, else $f(n) = g(n)$? – usul Sep 5 '16 at 17:53
• good point, I just edited some points to clarify. – xdavidliu Sep 5 '16 at 18:00
• This will look silly, but... what are some examples of these weird functions? And even relaxing the question, are there simple examples of functions $f,g$ such that $f(n)=O(g(n))$ (by itself) does not imply $g(n)=\Omega(f(n))$? (I.e., cases where the second assumption is needed) – Clement C. Sep 6 '16 at 1:30
• @ClementC., according to wikipedia, Knuth's definition (presumably standard in TCS) is $f = \Omega(g) \iff g = O(f)$. But for the other definition given there ("Hardy-Littlewood"), one can easily come up with counterexamples. – usul Sep 6 '16 at 7:07

## 1 Answer

EDIT: Now that I have fresh eyes in the morning, I see that I have thoroughly misread the question. The answer below applies to “if $f(n)\ne O(g(n))$, then $f(n)=\Omega(g(n))$”. As noted in comments above, the question as actually stated has a trivially true answer for all functions, that is, $f(n)=O(g(n))$ is equivalent to $g(n)=\Omega(f(n))$ immediately from the definition.

The answer is positive if $f$ and $g$ belong to a “well-behaved” family of functions which ensures that they are asymptotically comparable; in particular, if they are (restrictions to $\mathbb N$ of) functions taken from a Hardy field. For example, this holds if both functions are first-order definable (with parameters) in the real exponential field $(\mathbb R,+,\cdot,\exp)$, or in any o-minimal expansion of the real field for that matter.