2
$\begingroup$

How common is it to place articles on arXiv or similar sites before publishing in a peer-reviewed journal?

I'm trying to get a feel for what my chances are, of publishing in a journal if I put an unreviewed article on Cornell's archival site, before I publish. Is this common in theoretical computer science?

NOTE: I see @Kaveh has recommended putting a paper on arXiv first in this question, so this gives me some hope!

$\endgroup$
  • 12
    $\begingroup$ It is very common. $\endgroup$ – Chandra Chekuri Feb 15 '17 at 3:18
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ If a journal doesn't want to take a paper because it is already online as a preprint, the problem is with the journal. But I have never even heard of that happening. $\endgroup$ – David Eppstein Feb 15 '17 at 5:50
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ @RB Regarding double blind submissions: My experience has been that referees are strongly discouraged from googling the paper so as to try to discover its authors. The authors are not faulted for posting the paper elsewhere with full information. I have never heard of any reputable journal having any issue with arxiv preprints. $\endgroup$ – Aryeh Feb 15 '17 at 7:19
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ This question might be better suited for Academia. It probably already has an answer there. $\endgroup$ – Jan Johannsen Feb 15 '17 at 9:12
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Most TCS papers appear first in conferences rather than journals, and many want you to post a preprint online before submitting. From the most recent FOCS CFP: "Authors are encouraged to post full versions of their submissions in a freely accessible on-line repository such as the arxiv, the ECCC, or the Cryptology ePrint archive. (Papers that are not written well enough for public dissemination are probably also not ready for submission to FOCS.)" $\endgroup$ – Huck Bennett Feb 15 '17 at 17:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.