4
$\begingroup$

What is the best source -in terms of quality- that would explain the argument that uses computations concepts to demonstrate that the Maxwell's Demon does not break the second law of thermodynamics? I have an impression that this argument has some flaw, because all the sources I know use natural language. However, I would like some source that demonstrates formally.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Lienhard Pagel in his book "Information ist Energie" gives a quantum mechanical analysis of Maxwell's Demon. He uses his information concept instead of a pure computation concept. If I remember correctly, he explains it both in natural language and with formulas and computations. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 9, 2017 at 23:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ May be these two blog entries of Scott Aaronson are of interest: scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=1818 scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=762 $\endgroup$
    – Lamine
    Commented Dec 10, 2017 at 15:07

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

A good place to start looking at these ideas is this paper, though it talks about the (related) idea of information and thermodynamics. It relates fundamental computational tasks (eg. editing a bit) to fundamental thermodynamic tasks (eg. energy extraction). Following the links within the paper should give reasonable access to literature on the subject. Also, see this paper.

EDIT - There is also discussion regarding this on Scott Aaronson's blog https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3327. See the comments section too.

References -

1. The Hot Bit 1 : The Szilard-Landauer Correspondence, M Gopalkrishnan - arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.3533, 2013

2. The Thermodynamics of Computation — a Review, C. Bennet - International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21.12 (1982): 905-940.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Can you please give the references of the papers you cite so your answer remains valid even if the link does not work anymore? $\endgroup$
    – holf
    Commented Dec 10, 2017 at 8:29
  • $\begingroup$ Good point. Added the references. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 10, 2017 at 9:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.