8
$\begingroup$

Is there any result showing that models (say SVM, Neural-Net, kNN, etc) will have difficulty in learning "rare" instances/tail phenomena?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I think you accepted an answer too quickly -- it's a good answer, but there could be more possibilities out there as well. $\endgroup$
    – usul
    Commented Aug 8, 2018 at 8:35
  • $\begingroup$ @usul thanks for the comment. Do you have any further suggestion? Would be happy to hear additional thoughts. $\endgroup$
    – Daniel
    Commented Aug 8, 2018 at 14:13

1 Answer 1

10
$\begingroup$

In the classic PAC learning (i.e., classification) model, rare instances are not a problem. This is because the learner's test points are assumed to come from the same distribution as the training data. Thus, if a region of space is so sparse as to be poorly represented in the training sample, its probability of appearing during the test phase is low.

You'll need a different learning model, which explicitly looks at type-I and type-II errors, or perhaps some combined precision-recall score. Here again, I don't think there are any results indicating that a specific class of algorithms is particularly poorly suited for this task, but I could be wrong.

The closest I can think of is sensitivity to outliers --- AdaBoost is known to have this property, for example.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.