4
$\begingroup$

Is it known that $\textbf{BPP} \subseteq \textbf{P}^{\textbf{NP}}$?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 16
    $\begingroup$ No, it’s not known. However, $\mathrm{BPP\subseteq MA\subseteq S_2P\subseteq ZPP^{NP}}$. $\endgroup$ Aug 8 '18 at 11:31
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Looks like an answer to me. $\endgroup$
    – Auberon
    Aug 10 '18 at 8:39
9
$\begingroup$

Heller gives a relativized world where $BPP = EXP^{NP}$ which sits far outside of $P^{NP}$. Showing $BPP \neq EXP^{NP}$ unconditionally would in itself be considered a major breakthrough in derandomization.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ What would $BPP\neq EXP^{NP}$ or $BPP\subseteq P^{NP}$ give in terms of lower bounds? $\endgroup$
    – Mr.
    Feb 23 '19 at 22:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.