3
$\begingroup$

Does $\forall k\in \mathbb N \space NP\not\subseteq TISP(poly(n),n^k)$ has any separation of classes or consequences?

My main question is can use this to show that $P \neq NP$ or some thing useful about $P \neq NP$ .

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why do we need the $\forall$ quantifier here? If $NP$ is not a subset of $TISP(poly(n),n)$ then your statement should also be true for all $k>1$? $\endgroup$ Sep 3 '18 at 7:35
  • $\begingroup$ yes, they are equals. I thought they are different. $\endgroup$ Sep 3 '18 at 7:52
  • $\begingroup$ I think they are equals to $NP \not \subset TISP(poly(n),n^{o(1)})$ too. $\endgroup$ Sep 3 '18 at 7:58
7
$\begingroup$

This would imply that L⊊NP since L⊆TISP(poly(n),n^k) k∈N

$\endgroup$
1
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ It also can show $SC \neq NP$ in similar way. $\endgroup$ Sep 2 '18 at 19:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.