3
$\begingroup$

Does $\forall k\in \mathbb N \space NP\not\subseteq TISP(poly(n),n^k)$ has any separation of classes or consequences?

My main question is can use this to show that $P \neq NP$ or some thing useful about $P \neq NP$ .

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why do we need the $\forall$ quantifier here? If $NP$ is not a subset of $TISP(poly(n),n)$ then your statement should also be true for all $k>1$? $\endgroup$ – C Komus Sep 3 '18 at 7:35
  • $\begingroup$ yes, they are equals. I thought they are different. $\endgroup$ – Mohsen Ghorbani Sep 3 '18 at 7:52
  • $\begingroup$ I think they are equals to $NP \not \subset TISP(poly(n),n^{o(1)})$ too. $\endgroup$ – Mohsen Ghorbani Sep 3 '18 at 7:58
7
$\begingroup$

This would imply that L⊊NP since L⊆TISP(poly(n),n^k) k∈N

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ It also can show $SC \neq NP$ in similar way. $\endgroup$ – Mohsen Ghorbani Sep 2 '18 at 19:50

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.