I'm looking for a reference to the fact that LTL[XF]-definable languages (LTL where only the (strict) finally/future modality is allowed) correspond to the variety $\mathbf{R}$ (see: 1). A similar characterisation is available for LTL[XF,XP], namely the variety $\mathbf{DA}$, see: Theorem 11 from 2.
1 Brzowoski, Fich: Languages of R-Trivial Monoids LINK
2 Tesson, P., Thérien, D.: Diamonds are forever: the variety DA LINK
PS: I have an idea how to prove it (by employing the correspondence that R = partially-ordered DFA), but before writing the result it would make sense to check whether this is already known in the literature (although I do not claim any breakthrough).