The language
$$L=\bigcup_{n\in\mathbb N}\{0,1\}^{\lfloor n^\delta\rfloor}0^{n-\lfloor n^\delta\rfloor}$$
is computable in $\mathrm L\subseteq\mathrm{NSPACE}(n)=\mathrm{CSL}$, and it has $s_L(n)=2^{\lfloor n^\delta\rfloor}$.
The language
$$L=\bigcup_{n\in\mathbb N}\{0,1\}^{\lfloor(\log n)^c\rfloor}0^{n-\lfloor(\log n)^c\rfloor}$$
is computable in $\mathrm L\subseteq\mathrm{NSPACE}(n)=\mathrm{CSL}$, and it has $s_L(n)=2^{\lfloor(\log n)^c\rfloor}$.
You can construct any number of examples like this. Basically, if $f\colon\mathbb N\to\mathbb N$ is any function such that given $n$ in binary, $f(n)$ (in binary) is computable in space $O(n)$ (which is exponential space in terms of the length of its input) and $f(n)\le2^n$, then there exist languages $L\in\mathrm{DSPACE}(n)\subseteq\mathrm{CSL}$ such that $s_L(n)=f(n)$, such as
$$L=\bigcup_{n\in\mathbb N}\bigl\{w\in\{0,1\}^n:w<_\mathrm{Lex}\operatorname{bin}(f(n))\bigr\},$$
where $<_\mathrm{Lex}$ denotes lexicographic order, and $\operatorname{bin}(f(n))\in\{0,1\}^n$ is the binary expansion of $f(n)$.
In fact, it is easy to give an exact characterization along the same lines. Let me say that a nondeterministic TM computes a function $f\colon \mathbb N\to\mathbb N$ if for every input $x\in\mathbb N$ (in binary),
there exists a run of the machine that computes $f(x)$ (in binary), and
all runs either compute $f(x)$ or report a failure.
Then using the construction above and the Immerman–Szelepcsényi theorem, one can show that for any $f\colon\mathbb N\to\mathbb N$, the following are equivalent:
$f=s_L$ for some language $L\in\mathrm{CSL}$;
$f(n)$ is computable on a nondeterministic TM in space $O(n)$, including the size of the output.
(Note that base conversion can be done in linear space, hence it is immaterial whether we choose binary or any other base $b\ge2$.)