Questions tagged [curry-howard]

The tag has no usage guidance.

3
votes
2answers
173 views

How do continuations represent negations (under the Curry–Howard correspondence)?

Under the Curry–Howard correspondence, types can be thought of as propositions, and values inhabiting a type can be thought of as proofs that the corresponding proposition is true. (E.g., the ...
1
vote
0answers
77 views

Equality Theorems with Type Theoretic Proof

I am investigating how I might be able to translate even commonplace equalities/ inequalities via the so-called Curry-Howard Correspondance - from a generic, set theoretic plus AOC foundation - into a ...
3
votes
2answers
205 views

Languages that lack contraction, weakening or exchange

When learning about generalized arrows, a question arised to me: Are there any languages (or potential languages) that lack one or more of the structural rules: contraction, weakeing and exchange? ...
3
votes
2answers
312 views

Motivation for Dependent Type

By the Curry-Howard Isomorphism we view propositions (or theorems if true/inhabited) as types. But take the type $\mathbb{N} \implies \mathbb{N} \implies \mathbb{N} $. We have as witnesses to this ...
20
votes
2answers
1k views

Is there a typed lambda calculus which is consistent and Turing complete?

Is there a typed lambda calculus where the corresponding logic under the Curry-Howard correspondence is consistent, and where there are typeable lambda expressions for every computable function? This ...
11
votes
1answer
539 views

Simply typed lambda calculus and higher order logic

What is the relation between simply typed lambda calculus and higher order logic? Under Curry-Howard it seems that simply typed lambda calculus corresponds to propositional logic. How is it related ...
3
votes
2answers
156 views

Can Curry-Howard prove a theorem from the types in your program, that has nothing to do with your program? [closed]

The following link states: Curry-Howard means that any type can be interpreted as a theorem in some logical system, and any term can be interpreted as a proof of its type. This does not mean that ...