The 2024 Developer Survey results are live! See the results

# Questions tagged [derandomization]

Every randomized algorithm can be simulated by a deterministic algorithm, at the expense of an exponential increase in running time. Derandomization is about converting randomized algorithms into efficient deterministic algorithms.

107 questions
Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
55 views

### Does randomness help depth?

Suppose we have a $RNC^i$ or $BPNC^i$ algorithm for a problem, is it suspected that the problem has an $NC^i$ algorithm or just an $NC^j$ algorithm for some $j\geq i$? Is there any evidence for ...
4k views

### Is BPP vs. P a real problem after we know BPP lies in P/poly?

We know (for now about 40 years, thank Adleman, Bennet and Gill) that the inclusion BPP $\subseteq$ P/poly, and an even stronger BPP/poly $\subseteq$ P/poly hold. The "/poly" means that we ...
461 views

### Adleman's theorem over infinite semirings?

Adleman has shown in 1978 that $\mathrm{BPP}\subseteq \mathrm{P/poly}$: if a boolean function $f$ of $n$ variables can be computed by a probabilistic boolean circuit of size $M$, then $f$ can be also ...
180 views

### Variation of (derandomized) Valiant-Vazirani

I am interested in the following "improvement" of the Valiant-Vazirani reduction. As pointed out here, under the right derandomization assumptions one can obtain a deterministic polynomial-...
448 views

### What are the consequences of $BPP \neq P$?

I have seen a lot of people assume, $BPP = P$ . But to me, this seems false intuitively.(Though math is not without unintuitive results) And, to my admittedly limited understanding of the topic, the ...
61 views

### Amplifying success probability for PTMs with $poly(n) / \exp(n)$ gap?

The following is a well-known result of BPP in complexity theory, e.g., Theorem 1 and its proof from here: Consider a probabilistic Turing Machine (PTM) $M$, and a language $L \in BPP$: If $x \in L$ (...
107 views

### Fine-grained average-case derandomization

Many believe derandomization with polynomial overhead, $\mathsf{P} = \mathsf{BPP}$, because it follows from $2^{\Omega(n)}$ circuit lower bounds for $\mathsf{E}$ (IW97). Do we have any evidence for or ...
114 views

### How is inapproximability by polynomial size circuits sufficient for the Nisan-Wigderson generator?

I couldn't understand how exactly Yao's XOR lemma was used to prove the following claim made in the proof of Theorem 2 of the original paper describing the Nisan-Wigderson generator, so I decided to ...
56 views

365 views

### From $PIT\in P$ to $P=BPP$

If $PIT$ has been derandomized then still how far would we be from showing $P=BPP$? What additional barriers need to be climbed?
66 views

### Does deterministic PIT produce deterministic irreducible polynomial generation?

In $\Bbb F_q[x]$ given $d\in\Bbb N$ there is a deterministic $O(poly(nd\log q))$ algorithm to find an irreducible polynomial with $d=deg(x)$ under $GRH$ and an unconditional randomized algorithm. Do ...
97 views

### Scaled down and scaled up versions of Impagliazzo-Wigderson Therem

A famous theorem due to Impagliazzo and Wigderson states that if some function in $E=DTIME[2^{O(n)}]$ requires circuits of size $2^{\Omega(n)}$ then P=BPP. When can we change $P$ with some ...
356 views

911 views

### Space efficient "industrial" unbalanced expanders

I am looking for unbalanced expanders that are "good" and "space-efficient". Specifically, a bipartite left-regular graph $G=(A,B,E)$, $|A|=n$, $|B|=m$, with left degree $d$ is a $(k,\epsilon)$-...
512 views

### Fine-grained complexity of BPP

If E does not have i.o.-$2^{o(n)}$ circuits, then P=BPP, but this does not tell us about the fine-grained containments between $\mathrm{Time}(n^a)$ and $\mathrm{BPTime}(n^b)$. Are there reasonable ...
121 views

### On approximating problems in $\#P$

We know that for every counting problem $\#A$ in $\#P$, there is a probabilistic algorithm $\mathcal C$ that on input $x$, computes with high probability a value $v$ such that (1 − ε)\#A(x) ≤ v ≤ (1 ...
152 views

### On $\Delta_i^P$

We know $P\subseteq NP\cap coNP\subseteq\Delta_i^P=P^{\Sigma_{i-1}^P}\subseteq \Sigma_i^P\cap\Pi_i^P=NP^{\Sigma_{i-1}^P}\cap coNP^{\Sigma_{i-1}^P}$. If $P=BPP$ is there a 'higher' randomized class ...
189 views

### On earlier references for $P=BPP$ and Kolmogorov's possible view on modern breakthroughs involving randomness?

Kolmogorov and Uspenskii in this paper 'http://epubs.siam.org/doi/pdf/10.1137/1132060' speculate P=BPP in 1986. They do this without getting into circuit lower bounds and from a different view which ...
As far as I understand, the factor $O(\sqrt{\log OPT})$ approximation algorithm for treewidth of Feige, Hajiaghayi, and Lee is randomized, and no deterministic approximation algorithm with this factor ...