# Questions tagged [lo.logic]

Computational and mathematical logic.

93 questions
Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
4k views

### Are there any proofs the undecidability of the halting problem that does not depend on self-referencing or diagonalization ?

This is a question related to this one. Putting it again in a much simpler form after a lot of discussion there, that it felt like a totally different question. The classical proof of the ...
• 1,812
10k views

### Solid applications of category theory in TCS?

I've been learning a few bits of category theory. It certainly is a different way of looking at things. (Very rough summary for those who haven't seen it: category theory gives ways of expressing all ...
• 27.5k
5k views

### Are there non-constructive algorithm existence proofs?

I remember I might have encountered references to problems that have been proven to be solvable with a particular complexity, but with no known algorithm to actually reach this complexity. I struggle ...
• 8,951
2k views

### Translating SAT to HornSAT

Is it possible to translate a boolean formula B into an equivalent conjunction of Horn clauses? The Wikipedia article about HornSAT seems to imply that it is, but I have not been able to chase down ...
• 1,089
637 views

### Can we distinguish strictly syntactic and semantic methods in programming language?

While discussion strong normalization proofs, this comment contrasts the "normal forms model" with "purely syntactic methods". This brings me back to a more basic question: can we still distinguish ...
• 2,059
4k views

### Which interesting theorems in TCS rely on the Axiom of Choice? (Or alternatively, the Axiom of Determinacy?)

Mathematicians sometimes worry about the Axiom of Choice (AC) and Axiom of Determinancy (AD). Axiom of Choice: Given any collection ${\cal C}$ of nonempty sets, there is a function $f$ that, given a ...
• 27.5k
6k views

### Shallow versus Deep Embeddings

When encoding a logic into a proof assistant such as Coq or Isabelle, a choice needs to be made between using a shallow and a deep embedding. In a shallow embedding logical formulas are written ...
• 16.7k
2k views

### Is there a logic without induction that captures much of P?

The Immerman-Vardi theorem states that PTIME (or P) is precisely the class of languages that can be described by a sentence of First-Order Logic together with a fixed-point operator, over the class of ...
4k views

### Axioms necessary for theoretical computer science

This question is inspired by a similar question about applied mathematics on mathoverflow, and that nagging thought that important questions of TCS such as P vs. NP might be independent of ZFC (or ...
• 10.3k
6k views

### Extended Church-Turing Thesis

One of the most discussed questions on the site has been What it Would Mean to Disprove the Church-Turing Thesis. This is partly because Dershowitz and Gurevich published a proof of the Church-Turing ...
• 6,994
1k views

### What is the difference between proofs and programs (or between propositions and types)?

Given that the Curry-Howard Correspondence is so widely spread/extended, is there any difference between proofs and programs (or between propositions and types)? Can we really identify them?
• 2,805
2k views

### Starting SAT solver papers

I want to make a first SAT solver. I know the SAT competition and the SAT conference, and there are just so many papers on this subject. I'm a starter, an overwhelmed starter. Where should I begin? ...
• 551
871 views

### Combinators for the Primitive Recursive Functions

It is well-known that the S and K combinators are Turing Complete. Are there combinators that suffice to yield (only) the primitive recursive functions?
3k views

### Classification of Typed/Untyped Lambda Calculi

Can anyone explain briefly (if thats possible!) or refer me to a reference, summarizing the differences between untyped lambda calculus and the more common typed lambda calculi? I'm particularly ...
• 293
2k views

### What do we know about restricted versions of the halting problem

(UPDATE: a better formed question is posed here as the comments for the accepted answer below show that this question is not well-defined) The classical proof of the impossibility of the halting ...
• 1,812
1k views

### Can boolean algebra be expressed in simply typed lambda caclulus?

Boolean algebra can be expressed in untyped lambda calculus in (for example) this way. ...
525 views

### Is MALL + unrestricted recursive types Turing-complete?

If you look at the recursive combinators in the untyped lambda-calculus, such as the Y combinator or the omega combinator:  \begin{array}{lcl} \omega & = & (\lambda x.\,x\;x)\;(\lambda x.\,x\...
• 32.5k
320 views

### Characterising invisible equivalences by confluent rewrite rules

In response to another question, Extensions of beta theory of lambda calculus, Evgenij offered the answer: beta + the rule {s = t | s and t are closed unsolvable terms} where a term M is solvable if ...
• 4,316
1k views

### What are natural examples of non-relativizable proofs?

As I understand it, a proof that P=NP or P≠NP would need to be non-relativizable (as in recursion theory oracles). Virtually all proofs seem to be relativizable, though. What are good examples of ...
• 241
503 views

### Incomplete basis of combinators

This is inspired by this question. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be the collection of all combinators which only have two bound variables. Is $\mathcal{C}$ combinatorially complete? I believe the answer is ...
• 259
341 views

### What is the benefit of Krivine's notation?

I saw some people uses Krivine's notation for function application when presenting the syntax for the $\lambda$-calculus. For example, the $\lambda$-term $\lambda f . \lambda x . \lambda y . f\ x\ y$ ...
• 2,805
308 views

### Intuition behind proof systems

I'm trying to under stand the paper On p-Optimal Proof Systems and Logic for PTIME. There is a notion called proof systems in the paper and I do not get the intution: $\Sigma = \{0,1\}$ ... We ...
• 513
444 views

• 411
2k views

### Sum-of-squares proof system

Recently I have seen several articles on arxiv that refer to a proof system called sum-of-squares. Can someone explain what is a sum-of-squares proof and why such proofs are important/interesting? ...
• 4,041
2k views

### Where is the proof that Coq + Excluded Middle is consistent

I've seen (and heard) it claimed that it is safe to add the classical axiom of excluded middle to Coq, but I can not seem to find a paper supporting this claim. The papers I see listed on the Coq wiki ...
• 1,690
4k views

### What's the point of $\eta$-conversion in lambda calculus?

I think I'm not understanding it, but $\eta$-conversion looks to me as a $\beta$-conversion that does nothing, a special case of $\beta$-conversion where the result is just the term in the lambda ...
• 604
2k views

### Smallest possible universal combinator

I am looking for the smallest possible universal combinator, measured by the number of abstractions and applications required to specify such a combinator in the lambda calculus. Examples of universal ...
• 662
1k views

### A mathematical (categorical) description of type classes

A functional language can be viewed as a category where its objects are types and morphisms functions between them. How do type classes fit in this model? I assume we should only consider those ...
• 2,601
993 views

### Does the uncomputability of Kolmogorov complexity follow from Lawvere's Fixed Point Theorem?

Many theorems and "paradoxes" - Cantor's diagonalization, undecidability of hatling, undeciability of Kolmogorov complexity, Gödel Incompleteness, Chaitin Incompleteness, Russell's paradox, etc. -...
• 37.3k
716 views

### What is the minimal extension of FO that captures the class of regular languages?

Context: relations between logic and automata Büchi's Theorem states that Monadic Second Order logic over strings (MSO) captures the class of regular languages. The proof actually shows that ...
• 1,406
2k views

### Trace Equivalence vs LTL Equivalence

I am looking for an easy example of two transition systems that are LTL equivalent, but not trace equivalent. I have read the proof of Trace Equivalence being finer than LTL Equivalence in the book "...
• 173
4k views

### Is propositional resolution a complete proof system?

This question is about propositional logic and all occurrences of "resolution" should be read as "propositional resolution". This question is something extremely basic but it has been bothering me ...
• 12.6k
462 views

### How to show that a type in a system with dependent types is not inhabited (i.e. formula not provable)?

For systems without dependent types, like Hindley-Milner type system, the types correspond to formulas of intuitionistic logic. There we know that its models are Heyting algebras, and in particular, ...
• 2,601
Weak normalization for the simple typed lambda calculus can be proved (Turing) by induction on $\omega^2$. An extended lambda calculus with recursors on natural numbers (Gentzen) has a weak ...