Skip to main content

Questions tagged [type-theory]

Type structure is a syntactic discipline for enforcing levels of abstraction.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
11 votes
1 answer
1k views

Can Elementary Affine Logic be used as the core type system of a practical programming language?

Elementary Affine Logic is a type system which captures the class of λ-terms that can be reduced in elementary time. Moreover, EAL-typeable terms can be reduced using the abstract fragment of Lamping'...
MaiaVictor's user avatar
  • 3,177
2 votes
1 answer
245 views

How to encode a function from an existential type

I am having trouble using parametricity to show that existential types work in System F (or System Fω) in the way one would expect them to work. It is known that an existential type $\exists t.~P~t$ (...
winitzki's user avatar
  • 552
19 votes
3 answers
4k views

Classification of Typed/Untyped Lambda Calculi

Can anyone explain briefly (if thats possible!) or refer me to a reference, summarizing the differences between untyped lambda calculus and the more common typed lambda calculi? I'm particularly ...
jon_darkstar's user avatar
16 votes
1 answer
1k views

Can boolean algebra be expressed in simply typed lambda caclulus?

Boolean algebra can be expressed in untyped lambda calculus in (for example) this way. ...
Ilya Klyuchnikov's user avatar
9 votes
2 answers
2k views

What exactly is "large elimination"?

I'm studying type theory (mostly Coq) and often encounter the term "large elimination", usually when talking about type universes hierarchy consistency, for example: impredicative polymorphism + ...
deniss's user avatar
  • 201
49 votes
3 answers
4k views

How do 'tactics' work in proof assistants?

Question: How do 'tactics' work in proof assistants? They seem to be ways of specifying how to rewrite a term into an equivalent term (for some definition of 'equivalent'). Presumably there are formal ...
John Salvatier's user avatar
48 votes
2 answers
6k views

Explaining Applicative functor in categorical terms - monoidal functors

I'd like to understand Applicative in terms of category theory. The documentation for Applicative says that it's a strong lax ...
Petr's user avatar
  • 2,611
48 votes
5 answers
7k views

What is the most intuitive dependent type theory I could learn?

I am interested in getting a really solid grasp on dependent typing. I've read most of TaPL and read (if not fully absorbed) 'Dependent Types' in ATTaPL. I've also read and skimmed a bunch of articles ...
John Salvatier's user avatar
44 votes
4 answers
5k views

How would I go about learning the underlying theory of the Coq proof assistant?

I'm going over the course notes at CIS 500: Software Foundations and the exercises are a lot of fun. I'm only at the third exercise set but I would like to know more about what's happening when I use ...
user avatar
35 votes
3 answers
3k views

Type classes vs object interfaces

I don't think I understand type classes. I'd read somewhere that thinking of type classes as "interfaces" (from OO) that a type implements is wrong and misleading. The problem is, I'm having a problem ...
oconnor0's user avatar
  • 463
29 votes
6 answers
2k views

Why naturals instead of integers?

I'm interested in why natural numbers are so beloved by the authors of books on programming languages theory and type theory (e.g. J. Mitchell, Foundations for programming languages and B. Pierce, ...
Artem Pelenitsyn's user avatar
26 votes
1 answer
1k views

Are types propositions? (What are types exactly?)

I've been reading a lot on type systems and such and I understand roughly why they were introduced (in order to resolve Russel's paradox). I also understand roughly their practical relevance in ...
Rehno Lindeque's user avatar
26 votes
2 answers
2k views

Context Sensitive Grammars and Types

1) What, if any, is the relationship between static typing and formal grammars? 2) In particular, would it be possible for a linear bounded automaton to check whether, say, a C++ or SML program was ...
Diogenes Creosote's user avatar
25 votes
2 answers
3k views

Why do Agda and Coq disagree on strict positivity?

I've stumbled across a confusing disagreement between Agda and Coq that is not obviously related to the most well known distinctions between their type theories (e.g., (im)predicativity, induction-...
Colin Gordon's user avatar
21 votes
1 answer
2k views

Why it's impossible to declare an induction principle for Church numerals

Imagine, we defined natural numbers in dependently typed lambda calculus as Church numerals. They might be defined in the following way: ...
Konstantin Solomatov's user avatar
20 votes
2 answers
3k views

Is there a typed lambda calculus which is consistent and Turing complete?

Is there a typed lambda calculus where the corresponding logic under the Curry-Howard correspondence is consistent, and where there are typeable lambda expressions for every computable function? This ...
Morgan Thomas's user avatar
18 votes
2 answers
2k views

Implicit vs explicit subtyping

This page asserts that many languages do not use implicit subtyping (structural equivalence), prefering explicit/declared subtyping (declaration equivalence) I've mostly used programming ...
Frankie Ribery's user avatar
16 votes
1 answer
586 views

Minimal specification of Martin-Löf type theory

I'm reading the formal presentation of Martin-Löfs type theory (appendix of the HoTT book). The authors introduce a hierarchy of universes, then $\Pi, \Sigma,+, {\bf 0}, {\bf 1}$ and also $W$-types as ...
Nikolaj-K's user avatar
  • 505
16 votes
3 answers
1k views

Can we prove weak normalization for System F by induction on a transfinite ordinal

Weak normalization for the simple typed lambda calculus can be proved (Turing) by induction on $\omega^2$. An extended lambda calculus with recursors on natural numbers (Gentzen) has a weak ...
user avatar
16 votes
1 answer
805 views

Relative consistency of PA and some type theories

For a type theory, by consistency, I mean that it has a type which is not inhabited. From the strong normalization of the lambda cube, it follows that system $F$ and system $F_\omega$ are consistent. ...
fhyve's user avatar
  • 343
15 votes
1 answer
615 views

Logical Reations for an Impredicative System in a Predicative MetaTheory

Logical Relations for Impredicative languages like System F seem to rely critically on impredicativity of the ambient logic. Specifically, the interpretation for the forall-type will be defined in ...
Max New's user avatar
  • 1,695
15 votes
1 answer
1k views

Is MLTT effectively pCiC without Prop?

Is Martin-Löf type theory basically the predicative Calculus of inductive Constructions without impredicative $\mathtt{Prop}$? If they're closely related but with more differences than just $\mathtt{...
user's user avatar
  • 615
14 votes
0 answers
442 views

Are there simple core languages which are consistent and expressive?

The Calculus of Constructions is a very simple core functional language with dependent types. Per curry-howard isomorphism, it could, potentially, be very useful for writing programs and proofs. It, ...
MaiaVictor's user avatar
  • 3,177
13 votes
1 answer
1k views

Can affine lambda calculus solve every problem in P?

In Advanced Topics in Types and Programming Languages it is mentioned, in the chapter on sub-structural type systems, that a "carefully crafted" affine lambda calculus with a recursion combinator for ...
Jake's user avatar
  • 1,213
13 votes
3 answers
910 views

For what languages is there already a theory of observational equivalence?

For a correctness proof, I'm looking for a usable notion of program equivalence $\cong$ for Barendregt's pure type systems (PTSs); missing that, for enough specific type systems. My goal is simply to ...
Blaisorblade's user avatar
  • 2,069
12 votes
3 answers
2k views

Type inference for imperative statements other than assignment

In my search for research papers about type systems for imperative languages, I only find solutions for a language with mutable references but without genuine imperative control structures such as ...
nponeccop's user avatar
  • 301
11 votes
2 answers
896 views

Formalizing the theory of finite sets in type theory

Most proof assistants have a formalization of the concept of "finite set". These formalizations, however, differ wildly (although one hopes that they are all essentially equivalent!). What I don't ...
Jacques Carette's user avatar
11 votes
1 answer
327 views

reference request: deciding validity of higher-order quantified boolean formulas is not Kalmar-elementary

$\newcommand\iddots{⋰}$In "A simple proof of a theorem of Statman" (TCS 1992), Harry Mairson gives a simple proof of Statman's result that deciding $\beta\eta$-equality of terms in simply typed lambda ...
Noam Zeilberger's user avatar
11 votes
2 answers
450 views

Hereditary substitution with a universe hierarchy

I've read about hereditary substitution for the Simple Lambda Calculus and for The Logical Framework with distinct terms and types. I'm wondering, are there any examples of hereditary substitution in ...
Joey Eremondi's user avatar
11 votes
4 answers
1k views

Explaining monad transformers in categorical terms

Most resource regarding categorical notions in programming describe monads, but I've never seen a categorical description of monad transformers. How could monad transformers be described in the terms ...
Petr's user avatar
  • 2,611
10 votes
1 answer
368 views

Example of where violation of strict positivity condition in inductive types leads to inconsistency

Most dependent typed systems have a strict positivity conditions for inductive types. Does anybody know an example where violation of the condition leads to inconsistency in the system?
Konstantin Solomatov's user avatar
10 votes
3 answers
1k views

Universal and existential types

I'm trying to wrap my head around the concepts of universal and existential types but everywhere I look, I see either logical or operational intuitions (or implementations) (e.g. TAPL book by B. ...
socumbersome's user avatar
10 votes
1 answer
900 views

Will Martin-Löf Type Theory lead to a greater ability to write provably correct code?

This post refers to the Curry-Howard isomorphism and the Martin-Löf Type Theory. The post makes the claim of a future 'unification' between the the describing language of math, and the operation ...
hawkeye's user avatar
  • 2,581
10 votes
2 answers
513 views

Decidability of type inference and type checking in MLTT

In Martin-Löf's An Intuitionistic Theory of Types: Predicative Part it is proved that type checking $a \colon A$ is decidable subject to $a$ being typeable in the first place, by proving a ...
Josh's user avatar
  • 203
10 votes
1 answer
1k views

Algorithm to determine function equality on the simply typed lambda calculus?

We know that beta-equality of simply typed lambda-terms is decidable. Given M,N:σ→τ, is it decidable whether for all X:σ, MX $≃_β$ NX?
MaiaVictor's user avatar
  • 3,177
9 votes
1 answer
472 views

In System F à la Church, can we automatize type inference for the for-all elimination?

The question is the following. Generally when one have a term like $\Lambda X.t$, we can eliminate the forall by applying this term to a type, as instance $(\Lambda X.t)[T]\to t[X:=T]$. Now, suppose ...
Alejandro DC's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
854 views

Fixed points in dependent type theories

Most dependent type theories aim for some notion of correctness in two respects: The type system must be decidable. The type system must be consistent. e.g. $\forall \tau. \tau$ should not be ...
Jake's user avatar
  • 1,213
8 votes
3 answers
770 views

What's the logical counterpart to jumps with arguments on CPS terms?

It's well known that the CPS (continuation-passing style) translation often employed in compilers corresponds to double negation translation under the Curry-Howard isomorphism. Though often the target ...
paulotorrens's user avatar
8 votes
2 answers
878 views

An example of a totally computable function that is not definable in system T?

Could you give me an example of a totally computable function of type N × N → N that is not definable in System T? Thanks.
day's user avatar
  • 2,835
7 votes
1 answer
393 views

Can type inference be classified in two groups: unification-based and control-flow-based?

I recently came across the 1995 paper Safety analysis versus type inference (pdf link) by Palsberg and Schartzbach that contrasts unification-based type inference and static analysis methods based on ...
hugomg's user avatar
  • 173
7 votes
2 answers
678 views

"Correctness" of type theory

How to "proof" that type theory is correct? Or at least explain that it's meaningful in some sense. In what extent is this a mathematical question and in what is a philosophical one? When type ...
Konstantin Solomatov's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
807 views

Is Church-pentation implementable in Agda?

Inspired by suggestion in this question, I've implemented predicative Church encoding of Peano arithmetic. Exponentiation works fine, unfortunately tetration requires the level of one of the arguments ...
Łukasz Lew's user avatar
  • 1,187
6 votes
1 answer
682 views

Strong normalization property of CoC inside CoC

Wikipedia says that The CoC is strongly normalizing, although, by Gödel's incompleteness theorem, it is impossible to prove this property within the CoC since it implies inconsistency. Why is ...
amakarov's user avatar
  • 163
5 votes
1 answer
492 views

Complexity of type-checking in relation to complexity of normalization

In order to verify that a terminating program terminates, one thing that can be done is to actually run the program. That may take a lot of time. If the program is typed in a total type-system, we can ...
Łukasz Lew's user avatar
  • 1,187
4 votes
0 answers
524 views

Is it possible to derive induction by extending CoC with recursion?

Suppose we extended the CoC with primitive recursion; that is, we added a term µ x . t such that equality allowed unrolling recursive terms: ...
MaiaVictor's user avatar
  • 3,177
4 votes
0 answers
170 views

Hereditary Substitution with Inductives and Eliminators?

I'm wondering, is there any existing work on hereditary substitution with inductive type families and dependent eliminators? In particular, normalizing the application of an eliminator to an ...
Joey Eremondi's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
98 views

Is the encoding of existential types in System F adequate?

This is somewhat related to How to encode a function from an existential type Existential types can be encoded in System F. If $P$ is any type constructor, not necessarily covariant, then the ...
winitzki's user avatar
  • 552
4 votes
1 answer
783 views

Dependent Sums and Products

I'm trying to understand the connections between a few different concepts fundamental to dependent type theory. Dependent functions ($\Pi$-types) Including non-dependent functions ($A \rightarrow B$)...
Joel Burget's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
220 views

Type of induction principle for fixpoint types

To the Calculus of Constructions we could add a general fixpoint type constructor (accepting inconsistencies or assuming F is a ...
Labbekak's user avatar
  • 701
3 votes
0 answers
423 views

Is it possible to check equality of equi-recursive types, or recursive λ-terms?

Can we determine if two λ-terms are equal? Given two lambda terms, let's say they are equal if their (possibly infinite) Bohm trees are. Under this definition, for example, ...
MaiaVictor's user avatar
  • 3,177