Questions tagged [typed-lambda-calculus]
The typed-lambda-calculus tag has no usage guidance.
74
questions
2
votes
0
answers
42
views
Variable opening in locally-nameless representation
Although similar to a previously unanswered question, my query focuses on a different aspect of normalization. I'm trying to adjust the proof of strong normalization of STLC, given in Jeremy Avigad's ...
10
votes
0
answers
203
views
Is there a text that discusses both the “lambda cube” of pure type theories and Martin-Löf's intuitionistic type theories, and compares them?
I am lost in a maze of twisty little type theories, all different.
There are a number of works (textbooks and papers) that discuss pure type theories, and specifically the ones constituting the ...
0
votes
0
answers
29
views
Which family of bicartesian closed functors can define the semantics of simply typed lambda calculus with products and sums
Given any bicartesian closed category $\mathbf{C}$, any natural number $n \geq 0$, and any vector $\boldsymbol{A} \in \mathbf{C}^n$ with $n$ objects $A_1, A_2, … A_n \in \mathbf{C}$, how can I define ...
-1
votes
1
answer
74
views
What is the type of the lambda term $\lambda a.a(\lambda yt.t)(ya)$?
I was given an exercise that asked me to assign a simple type to the lambda term:
$$
\lambda a.a(\lambda yt.t)(ya)
$$
but I couldn't find one, furthermore, the lambda term seems untypable to me ...
1
vote
1
answer
81
views
Intuition behind UTT's internal logic
The "internal logic" of type theory UTT is defined in LF as follows:
What's the intuition behind this definition? I can kind of understand the declaration of the the first three constants - ...
5
votes
2
answers
324
views
Lambda-calculus: Beta-equivalent terms have the same type
In the simply-typed lambda calculus, how do you prove that: If two terms are beta-equivalent, then they have the same type?
My guess is that I should use the subject reduction, and maybe the ...
0
votes
0
answers
89
views
Simple Lambda Calculus Question
For any 2 strongly normalizing terms in the simply typed Lambda Calculus, s and t, is st also strongly normalizing? And why? I'm a bit confused as this is used in a proof regarding strong ...
5
votes
2
answers
255
views
Complexity of convertibility in simply typed λ-calculus with sums
For the simply typed λ-calculus with only the function type →, the complexity of deciding βη-equivalence is well-understood: it's TOWER-complete (as mentioned here). I expect the same should be true ...
1
vote
0
answers
67
views
Interpretation of the degree of a redex
In Girard Proofs and Types, The degree of a type is defined as follows
$$\begin{align*}\partial(T_i)&=1\text{ if }T_i\text{ is atomic}\\\partial(U\times V)=\partial(U\rightarrow V) &=\max(\...
1
vote
1
answer
86
views
Extension of primitive recursion, that is as powerful as System-T
I know that System-T restricted to first-order types is exactly as powerful as primitive recursive functions, because I proved it in Agda.
I asked myself, if there is a extension of primitive ...
0
votes
1
answer
102
views
Can we use relational parametricity to simplify the type $\forall a.\,((a\to r)\to a)\to a$ and similar types?
This question is similar to Can we use relational parametricity to simplify the type $\forall a. ( (a \to r) \to r ) \to (a \to r) \to r$? but looks more complicated. It is about using relational ...
3
votes
1
answer
138
views
Can we use relational parametricity to simplify the type $\forall a. ( (a \to r) \to r ) \to (a \to r) \to r$?
This question is about using relational parametricity to resolve practical questions in pure functional programming in System F.
Consider the following types of polymorphic functions:
$$ \forall a.\, (...
2
votes
0
answers
144
views
How to implement the next type inference algorithm?
Here I mean only simple typed Lambda calculus / Combinatory logic.
Notation: Combinatory logic terms: $F, X_i, Y_i$. Term application: $(F*X_1)$. Type variables $x_i,y_i$. Type assignment: $X:x_i$.
...
10
votes
0
answers
168
views
Stratification of System Fω
I'm wondering if there's any update on this conjecture listed by Urzyczyn from years and years ago (I don't think that's its first appearance), which I'll restate below.
System Fω can be stratified ...
1
vote
0
answers
148
views
What is the model of computation that corresponds (in the manner of Curry-Howard) to the deduction rule of resolution?
The Curry-Howard Correspondence is well-documented for the isomorphism which associates the intuitionistic natural deduction proof calculus (logic side) with the type system for the simply typed ...
2
votes
1
answer
78
views
Question about "Free-ness" of Free SCWF
In Category with Family by Castellan et al., they introduce the concept of Free SCWF as correspondence of STLC with base type. Seemingly, they define Free B-SCWF as the synonym of initial B-SCWF.
My ...
1
vote
1
answer
60
views
Question in relating STLC and Free CCC
In Lambek's Intro to Higher Order Cat Logic, Chapter 1 Section 4 introduces the free construction (upon graph)
My question is, if I want to have STLC + (fake/incomplete) boolean type, how do I have ...
0
votes
1
answer
88
views
Can you always throw away the types when evaluating lambda expressions?
As I understand it, in the simply typed lambda calculus you can type-check your terms, then throw away all the types and do the evaluation exactly as if it was the untyped lambda calculus. Is that ...
7
votes
0
answers
186
views
$\lambda$-definability and structure preserved by homomorphisms
I imagine there are some standard results that bear on this, but I'm having trouble finding a proof or refutation of it.
Some prelimary definitions.
A Henkin structure $A = (A^\cdot, ⟦\cdot⟧_A)$ for ...
9
votes
0
answers
201
views
Constructive Strong Normalization of the Extended Calculus of Constructions
The extended calculus of constructions (ECC) is basically the calculus of constructions with cumulative universes. I use the definition which Zhaohui Luo used in his PhD theses which contained a proof ...
3
votes
2
answers
502
views
Are there strongly normalizing lambda terms that cannot be given a System F type?
I know that all well-typed System F terms are strongly normalizing, but is the converse true as well? In other words, does System F typeability precisely characterize program termination? (And if so, ...
2
votes
0
answers
161
views
Set-theoretic encoding of functions in type theory
Functions usually get encoded in set theory as follows. A function $A\to B$ is a subset $f\subset A\times B$ such that $\pi_1:f\to A$ is a bijection.
In type theory to give a function $A\to B$ is to ...
2
votes
1
answer
172
views
Dependent eliminator for empty type in intensional Martin-Löf type theory
In calculus of inductive constructions you can just say that the empty type is the type with no constructors and it automatically builds the dependent eliminator.
But let's say I'm setting up ...
-1
votes
1
answer
102
views
How much type information do Hindley-Milner proof assistants need to remain sound?
A known benefit of the HM type system is that you can usually infer a term's most general type with no user-provided type annotations. For example, if my theory contains the standard axiom: $$\forall ...
1
vote
2
answers
186
views
Explicit type system with infinite non-cumulative universe hierarchy
Is there an open-source proof assistant or at least an explicit set of rules written down somewhere for a type system with an infinite non-cumulative universe hierarchy and unique typing?
I want to ...
2
votes
2
answers
150
views
$\mathbb{N}$ in intensional MLTT with judgmentally commutative $+$ and $\times$
Is there a way to implement natural numbers in intensional Martin-Löf type theory so that addition and multiplication is judgmentally commutative?
4
votes
1
answer
219
views
Model of MLTT with $\eta$ rule where function extensionality fails
Consider intensional Martin-Löf type theory with judgmental $\eta$ rule for dependent product types. Is there a model of it where function extensionality fails?
2
votes
1
answer
88
views
Normal term of double negation of W-type
Consider the intensional Martin-Löf type theory without axiom of choice or the law of excluded middle.
Let $A:U_0$ be a type and $B:A\to U_0$ be a function such that $\Sigma_{a:A}(B(a)\to 0)$is ...
2
votes
1
answer
107
views
Typing inference as a map on abstract syntax trees
Is there a reference that explains typing inference for Martin-Löf type theory as a computable map from abstract syntax trees of terms to abstract syntax trees of types? I don't want to identify non-...
5
votes
1
answer
215
views
Is the Mendler-encoding in System-F adequate?
In the paper "Efficiency of Lambda-Encodings in Total Type Theory" it is mentioned that the Church-encoding is adequate and the Parigot encoding is not adequate. This means that any ...
4
votes
1
answer
472
views
Complexity of type inference in the simply typed lambda calculus
A similar question was answered here:
Is simply typed lambda calculus equivalent to primitive recursive functions
What I conclude from the answers is that the complexity is that of the extended ...
7
votes
0
answers
233
views
Category theory lambda cube?
If simply typed lambda calculus corresponds to cartesian closed categories, what types of categories do other calculi in the lambda cube correspond to?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda_cube
10
votes
2
answers
569
views
Is there an efficient beta-equivalence algorithm?
Is there an efficient algorithm to determine if two terms are beta-equivalent? Specifically, I am curious about simply-typed-lambda-calculus, so you can assume both terms are strongly normalizing.
I ...
-2
votes
1
answer
117
views
Beta reduction and vacuous lambda abstraction [closed]
Suppose we have the following typed lambda term (where $s$ does not occur in E (which is of type $s \to p$) and $s$ and $s'$ have the same type), and want to apply $\beta$-reduction:
$(\lambda s. E)\, ...
6
votes
1
answer
156
views
What arithmetical theorems can plain $\lambda \Pi$ reason about?
I've read that System F cannot state or prove theorems of the First Order Theory of Arithmetic. I assume this is because we lack dependent types, so we cannot explicitly express $\forall n:\mathbb{N}....
6
votes
1
answer
229
views
Decidability of rank-k polymorphism vs. System F
There's a paper by Kfoury from 1992, "Type Reconstruction in Finite Rank Fragments of
the Second-Order $\lambda$-Calculus", that proves that type inference for Curry-style rank-$k$ polymorphic lambda ...
3
votes
1
answer
194
views
Type of induction principle for fixpoint types
To the Calculus of Constructions we could add a general fixpoint type constructor (accepting inconsistencies or assuming F is a ...
3
votes
0
answers
165
views
Type System Of $\lambda\mu$-Calculus
reading this paper on CPS-tranformation from the $\lambda\mu$-calculus, I'm a bit confused about the type system presented:
Why second-order formulas in the types? Is this according to the Curry-...
5
votes
2
answers
258
views
What's the point of stack judgement in CBPV?
Call-by-push-value (CBPV) introduces two main families of types, values and computations, and their corresponding judgements. However, in some extensions/variants/adaptation of CBPV, there is a third ...
3
votes
0
answers
393
views
Is System-F with higher-kinded newtypes equivalent in computational power to System-F omega?
If we have System-F with higher-kinded types and newtypes, then we can express everything (I think) of System-F omega, except we have to manually (un)pack.
For example:
...
6
votes
1
answer
317
views
Fixed set of type constructors to simulate all intensional inductive families?
I'm wondering, are there small dependent calculi that can simulate a language with inductive families (that is, has a type isomorphic to each inductive family, at least as powerful of induction ...
6
votes
1
answer
232
views
Structural equality of Pi Types with heterogeneous equality?
I'm trying to implement a proof of the following type:
...
7
votes
2
answers
393
views
Termination checking for Scott-encodings in System F with positive-recursive types
Is there any research on termination analysis on Scott-encodings in System F with positive-recursive types.
All papers I have found use languages with constructors and case analysis (for example ...
11
votes
1
answer
461
views
Understanding the Proof of Strong Normalization of the Calculus of Constructions
I have difficulties in understanding the proof of strong normalization for the calculus of constructions. I try to follow the proof in the paper of Herman Geuvers "A short and flexible proof of Strong ...
6
votes
2
answers
295
views
Typing of substitution in a bidirectional type system
In most typed lambda calculi, we have the following lemma:
If $\Gamma \vdash t_1 : \tau_1$ and $\Gamma, x : \tau_1, \Delta \vdash t_2 : \tau_2$ then $\Gamma,\Delta[t_1/x] \vdash t_2[t_1/x] : \tau_2[...
12
votes
1
answer
941
views
Proof techniques for showing that dependent type checking is decidable
I'm in a situation where I need to show that typechecking is decidable for a dependently-typed calculus I'm working on. So far, I've been able to prove that the system is strongly normalizing, and ...
9
votes
1
answer
467
views
What's the difference between Moggi's computational metalanguage and Moggi's lambda calculus?
This is a reference confusion. Sometimes I see people use the term "Moggi's computational metalanguage" to refer to the calculus presented by Moggi, and sometimes to "Moggi's computational lambda ...
3
votes
2
answers
319
views
Moggi's computational metalanguage
In Notions of Computation and Monads Moggi models the notion of a computation of type $A$, $TA$, using a monad $T$. Among other things this ensures the $T\eta$ rule:
$$\frac{x: A \vdash a:TB}{x:A \...
0
votes
1
answer
55
views
Head variables of terms after application
We work in the Church-style simply typed lambda calculus. All terms shall be considered in long normal form. Any term of type $A_1\rightarrow A_2\ldots\rightarrow A_n \rightarrow 0$ is of the form $\...
10
votes
1
answer
247
views
Program inversion algorithms for higher-order programs
The term program inversion
has multiple shades of meaning, but probably got started with
J. McCarthy's 1956 work The Inversion of Functions Defined by Turing Machines in the context of AI. By now ...