Breaking the Ackermann function all the way down to the elementary operators would really be quite lengthy, but here is a sketch: Note that when computing $A(m,x)$ recursively, at any point of the computation you are dealing with an expression of the form $A(m_1,A(m_2,\dots,A(m_k,z)\dots)$. Given a bijective pairing function $p$ with inverse $(\pi_1,\pi_2)$, we can encode this state as $p(z,p(k,p(m_k,\dots,p(m_2,m_1)\dots)$ (just $p(z,0)$ in case $k=0$). We then can define the one-step evaluation function, given a state: $e(p(z,0)) = p(z,0)$; $e(p(z,p(k,p(0,c)))) = p(z+1,p(k-1,c))$; $e(p(0,p(k,p(m+1,c)))) = p(1,p(k,p(m,c)))$; $e(p(z+1,p(k,p(m+1,c)))) = p(z,p(k+1,p(m+1,p(m,c))))$. You then get the n-step evaluation function using primitive recursion: $E(0,m,x) = p(x,p(1,m))$ and $E(n+1,m,x) = e(E(n,m,x))$. Finally, wrap $\mu$-recursion around $E$ to find the point where we get to a state of the form $p(z,0)$ - $z$ will be $A(m,x)$.