Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
A reduction is the transformation of one problem into another problem. A example of using a reduction would be to be to show if a problem P is undecidable. This would be achieved by transforming or performing a reduction of a decision problem $P$ into an undecidable problem. If this can be achieved then we have shown that this problem P is undecidable.
6
votes
Accepted
$\mathsf{TC^0}$-completeness and reductions
For question #1: If there is a complete problem for uniform TC$^0$ under uniform AC$^0$ m-reductions, then the counting hierarchy collapses. I don't know if this qualifies as "bad". … For question #3: MAJORITY and division are both complete for TC$^0$ under AC$^0$-Turing reductions. …
3
votes
Are the notions of #P-completeness via Turing reductions and polynomial many-one counting re...
One can construct artifical examples of functions in $FP^{\#P}$ that are complete under poly-time Turing reductions but seem unlikely to be complete under reductions that make only one query. …
9
votes
Accepted
Is Circuit Minimization $P$-hard under logspace reductions?
Not only is MCSP not known to be hard for P under logspace reductions; it's not even known to be hard for NL under logspace reductions. … If you don't like non-uniform reductions, then MKTP is also hard for $NISZK_L$ under (uniform) probabilistic $NC^0$ reductions. But no hardness under uniform deterministic reductions is known. …