42
An example that I love is the problem where, given distinct $a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n \in \mathbb{N}$, decide if: $$\int_{-\pi}^{\pi} \cos(a_1 z) \cos(a_2 z) \ldots \cos(a_n z) \, dz \ne 0$$
This at first seems like a continuous problem to evaluate this integral, however it is easy to show that this integral is not zero iff there exists a balanced partition of ...
26
There are many continuous problems of the form "test whether this combinatorial input can be realized as a geometric structure" that are complete for the existential theory of the reals, a continuous analogue of NP. In particular, this implies that these problems are NP-hard rather than polynomially solvable. Examples include testing whether a given graph is ...
25
This is really a stubborn -- and well-studied -- problem. Regarding positive results, an exact algorithm by Kameda and Weiner, a heuristic approach by Polák, and a recent approach using SAT solvers by Geldenhuys et al. come to mind. But there seem to be far more negative results ruling out other possible approaches (e.g. approximation algorithms, special ...
24
(Edit notes: I reorganized this after freaking out at its length.)
Literature on coordinate descent can be a little hard to track down. Here are some reasons for this.
Many of the known properties of coordinate methods are captured in umbrella theorems for more general descent methods. Two examples of this, given below, are the fast convergence under ...
22
In some technical sense you are asking whether $P = NP \cap coNP$. Suppose that $L \in NP \cap coNP$, thus there exists poly-time $F$ and $G$ so that $x \in L$ iff $\exists y: F(x,y)$ and $x \not\in L$ iff $\exists y: G(x,y)$. This can be recast as a minmax characterization by
$f_x(y) = 1$ if $F(x,y)$ and $f_x(y) = 0$ otherwise; $g_x(y) = 0$ if $G(x,y)$ ...
15
Here is an example, where one can produce a solution in polynomial time, but evaluating a given solution is NP-hard.
Input: Positive integers $n,k$ (in unary encoding), with $k\leq n$.
Task: Maximize the number of edges in an $n$-vertex graph under the constraint that its maximum clique size is at most $k$.
Solution: It is known from extremal graph ...
14
Look for Minimum Rainbow Subgraph.
14
Seymour and Thomas showed a min-max characterization of treewidth. Yet, tree width is NP-hard. This however is not quite the kind of characterization you are asking for, because the dual function $g$ is not a polynomial time computable function of a short certificate. This is most likely unavoidable for NP complete problems, because otherwise we would have ...
13
This seems to be equivalent to packing disks of max radius -- a very well studied problem, at least if your box is a square, see, e.g.,Circle packing in a square. For heuristics see, e.g., http://www.pack-any-shape.com/
13
Parity games, Mean-payoff games, Discounted games, and Simple Stochastic games fall within this category.
All of them are infinite two-player zero-sum games played on graphs, where players control vertices and choose where a token should go next. All have equilibria in memoryless positional strategies, meaning that each player chooses an edge at each choice ...
13
While this doesn't exactly answer your original question, it's a (conjectural) example of a sort of philosophical counterpoint: a problem where the presentation is discrete but all of the hardness comes from the 'continuous' aspect of the problem.
The problem is the Sum of Square Roots problem: given two sets of integers $A=\{a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_m\}$ and $B=...
12
Sorry I'm late! In quantum computing theory, there are lots of examples of optimization problems over the unitary group that, surprisingly (at least to me), are solvable in (classical) polynomial time by reduction to semidefinite programming.
Here was an early example: solving a problem of mine from 2000, in 2003 Barnum, Saks, and Szegedy showed that Q(f), ...
12
The premise of the question is a little flawed: there are many who would argue that quadratics are the real "boundary" for tractability and modelling, since least-squares problems are almost as 'easy' as linear problems. There are others who'd argue that convexity (or even submodularity in certain cases) is the boundary for tractability.
Perhaps what is ...
12
An optimal solution lies on some face. So, we can go through all the faces of the cube, and find all stationary points on each of the faces.
Here is a more concrete procedure. A face of the cube can be characterized by two disjoint index sets $I_0$ and $I_1$. For $i \in I_0$, we fix $x_i = 0$, and for $i \in I_1$ we fix $x_i = 1$. Let $\tilde{x}$ ...
11
This is called the (linear) assignment problem. It can be solved efficiently through linear programming over the Birkhoff polytope.
11
I meant to leave this as a comment, but I don't have the reputation to do so yet. This question was crossposted over at Mathoverflow, where I mention that the problem is NP-complete.
See here.
To avoid a contradiction with Chandra Chekuri's answer, I do not believe that the LP given in his answer is integral. To see this consider the uniform matroids $...
11
Your problem (as stated) seems to be NP-hard. Here is a reduction from Partition.
Given an instance of Partition (a collection $x_1,\ldots,x_n$ of positive integers), construct a graph with $n+1$ vertices $v_1,\ldots,v_{n+1}$ and, for each $i$, two edges from $v_i$ to $v_{i+1}$: one of cost zero, one of cost $x_i$.
Suppose the Partition instance is ...
11
(Moved from comments) Here's an idea for getting a constant factor approximation, assuming P and Q satisfy the triangle inequality. I thought it might give a 2-approximation, but all I can prove right now is an approximation ratio of 4.
(1) In the problem as stated, the weight of edge $pq$ in the combined graph (after the correspondence $p$–$p'$ and $q$–$q'$...
10
The problem is still NP-complete. Here's a reduction from the Treewidth problem on general graphs. Recall that for a graph G of treewidth at least two, the treewidth is not affected when subdividing an edge by a degree-2 vertex (i.e. replacing an edge $\{u,v\}$ by a new vertex $x$ and edges $\{u,x\}$, $\{x,v\}$ ).
Given an input graph $G$ on $n$ vertices, ...
10
In the geometric setting, where $C(x,y) = \|x - y \|$, this formulation is called the bottleneck matching problem. It's possible that this is the generic term for it (I've seen this formulation used in the Kleinberg-Tardos algorithms book for MSTs).
10
We did some research on the problem of proving in tree-like Resolution whether a fixed graph $G$ has a clique of size $k$ (where $k$ is usually small). In particular we discovered that refutations of size $n^{\Omega(k)}$ are needed for a large class of graphs.
You can find the paper Parameterized Complexity of DPLL Search Procedures at this link.
10
The problem is likely to be hard to approximate. The densest bipartite subgraph problem can be cast as a special case. Given a bipartite graph $(V,E)$ where $V=V_1 \uplus V_2$ define $f(S,T)$ for $S \subseteq V_1, T \subseteq V_2$ to be the number of edges between $S$ and $T$. Then $f$ satisfies the desired property. In fact $f(S,\cdot)$ is modular and so is ...
10
We can compute $m$ in linear time.
For simplicity suppose that the arrays are 0 based: $A[0..n-1]$, $B[0..n-1]$.
We want to compute $m = \max_i B[i]+i$.
Let $max = \max_i A[i]$.
Obviously $max \leq m$.
Let $A[j]$ be $B[k]$ after sorting. If $A[j] \leq max - n$ we have
$$B[k] + k \leq B[k] + (n-1) = A[j] + (n-1) \leq (max-n) + (n-1) = max-1 < max \leq ...
10
There is a naive algorithm for programs with bounded-size inputs: enumerate all programs in order of increasing length (or execution time, which is a bounded function of the length). If you can prove that the program is equivalent to the original, stop; otherwise keep searching.
This algorithm is sound. In order for it to be complete, you need to be able to ...
10
I would rephrase the question as follows:
Consider the function $F$ and the family of functions $F_{a,b}$ defined as
$$F_{a,b}(x) = F(a,b,x) =ax+b.$$
Can we compute $F_{a,b}$ faster than the complexity of $F$?
If yes, given $a$ and $b$, can we algorithmically find such an algorithm?
As babou wrote I think the answer depends on your computation ...
10
Fixed Point Logic $+$ Counting (FPC) is believed to capture most of the $P$ solvable problems. Anderson, Dawar and Holm 2015 [1]showed that optimization of linear programs is expressible in FPC. Dawar and Wang 2016 [2]showed that The FPC implementation of the ellipsoid method extends to semidefinite programs (subject to some technical conditions).
9
The Clique Partitioning Problem might not be the most popular NP-hard problem, but it was efficiently solved using branch-and-bound, see this paper: http://joc.journal.informs.org/content/6/2/141.abstract
9
For TSP, checkout this book...
http://www.tsp.gatech.edu/book/index.html
My understanding is that there is no one tool to kill them all. Arguably any recursive solution deploying backtracking and some scoring function is using branch and bound. As such, a large fraction of solvers to NP hard problems use some form of branch and bound.
9
I guess that you want the set of optimal solutions of the LP as small as possible. (Otherwise, c=0 certainly makes x* one of the optimal solutions but probably that is not what you want.)
One way to obtain such c is as follows. If x*i=0, then let ci be any strictly negative number. If x*i>0, then let ci=0.
If you want to know all the vectors c with ...
9
There's a simple reduction from knapsack. Binary search for the solution to your knapsack instance, then solve the "dual knapsack" with that value as your covering constraint $B$. Compare the value given by the "dual knapsack" against your knapsack packing constraint, which gives you the direction to continue the binary search.
I think you can use the same ...
Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible
