# Tag Info

27

As others have pointed out, it's debatable to what extent the thing you're trying to explain is even true. One could argue that, in the 60s and 70s, theoretical computer scientists were just more interested in the sorts of problems that turn out to be either in P or else NP-complete. Today, because of the rise of complexity-theoretic cryptography, quantum ...

25

As Steven notes, the canonical example is $\mathsf{IP} = \mathsf{PSPACE}$. This collapse does not relativize, in the sense that there is an oracle $A$, subject to which $\mathsf{IP}^A \ne \mathsf{PSPACE}^A$. The intuition why the known proof of this result avoids the relativization barrier is that it uses arithmetization (Yonatan alluded to this in a comment)...

21

If P=NP, there must be polynomial-time algorithms for NP-complete problems. However, there might not be any algorithm that provably solves an NP-complete problem and provably runs in polynomial time.

20

Many natural problems can be expressed as Constraint Satisfaction Problems, and there are dichotomy theorems for CSPs.

20

Predecessor versions of this paper have been around for more than 15 years. I remember that there were counter-examples to the first versions, then first revisions, counter-examples to the first revisions, second revisions, new counter-examples, further revisions, further counter-examples, and so on. It would be much better, if the authors were able to ...

17

I think the answer is yes, even today there is no known natural problem that is a candidate for violating the Isomorphism Conjecture. The primary reason is that typically natural NP-complete problems are very easily seen to be paddable, which Berman and Hartmanis showed suffices to be isomorphic to SAT. For natural graph-related problems this typically ...

17

Let me give a summary of my understanding of the motivation for the approach. Be warned that I am fairly new to the concept of Borel determinacy, and not at all an expert in set theory. All mistakes are mine. Also I am not sure reading this is all that much better than reading Gowers' posts. I think what Gowers has in mind is not a finitary analogue of the ...

17

If you assume that $P=^?NP$ is provable in PA (or ZFC), a trivial example is the following: Input: N (integer in binary format) For I = 1 to N do begin if I is a valid encoding of a proof of P = NP in PA (or ZFC) then halt and accept End Reject Another - less trivial - example that relies on no assumption is the following: Input: x (boolean ...

16

It seems that this idea is attributed to Levin (It is called optimal search). I believe this fact is well known. A similar algorithm is described in wikipedia for instance, although using the subset sum problem. In this article from scholarpedia you can find several references on the subject, including a pointer to the original algorithm and to some other ...

15

The basic idea is that summing over all Boolean strings (VNP) is like counting the solutions to an NP problem. Even from this perspective, one sees that VNP is more like #P than NP. This is also true as permanent is complete for both VNP and #P. Indeed, the Boolean part of VNP is essentially just #P/poly (it contains #P/poly and is contained in $\mathsf{FP}^{... 15 To be clear, it's not meant to be formalizable. It's not a theorem, it's an observation about the world -- it's okay if "natural" is subjective here. For analogy, if someone says "differentiation is mechanics while integration is art", they're not inviting you to formalize "mechanics" and "art" and prove the statement, they're trying to convey a general ... 14 Contrary to some claims earlier in this thread, algebrization in the sense of Aaronson & Wigderson is not known to subsume relativization. For example, $$\tag{\dagger}(\exists \mathcal{C}: \mathcal{C} \subset \mathsf{NEXP} \wedge \mathcal{C} \not \subset \mathsf{P/poly})\implies \mathsf{NEXP} \not\subset \mathsf{P/poly}$$ is a statement that ... 14 A proof system for propositional logic is called polynomially bounded, if every tautology$\varphi$has a proof in the system of length polynomial in the length of$\varphi$. The statement "There is no polynomially bounded propositional proof system" is equivalent to$\mathsf{NP} \neq \mathsf{co}\text-\mathsf{NP}$by a classic result of Cook and Reckhow, ... 14 As a rule of thumb, for any unsolved problem people tend to conjecture the statement that starts with a universal quantifier - since if it started with an existential one, then one would expect to have a solution found. Other than this, this topic has been discussed at several other places, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P_versus_NP_problem#... 12 For question 1, the BGS construction can be performed in exponential time, so you can construct such$B \in \mathsf{EXP}$. (For question 2: Sasho Nikolov's answer was originally only for$\mathsf{\Sigma_k P}$-complete languages, and I pointed out that one can also take any$B' \in \mathsf{NP} \cap \mathsf{coNP}$, since$\mathsf{NP}^{\mathsf{NP} \cap \mathsf{...

12

Geometric complexity theory (GCT) (also [1]) has not been mentioned yet. its a large ambitious program to connect P vs NP to algebraic geometry. eg a brief synopsis from the survey Understanding the Mulmuley-Sohoni Approach to P vs. NP, Regan: Stability is informally a notion of not being “chaotic,” and has developed into a major branch of algebraic ...

11

$P \ne NP$ if and only if worst-case one-way functions exist. Reference: Alan L. Selman. A survey of one-way functions in complexity theory. Mathematical systems theory, 25(3):203–221, 1992.

11

For question 2, you can take any $B' \in \mathsf{PH}$ (this means you cannot bring down the $B$ in the BGS result down from $\mathsf{EXP}$ to $\mathsf{PH}$ without resolving the big question). Clearly for any $B'$, $P \subseteq \mathsf{P}^{B'} \subseteq \mathsf{NP}^{B'}$. Let $B' \in \Sigma_i^{\mathsf{P}}$. Recall that, by the definition of the Polynomial ...

10

The following result by Raz (Elusive Functions and Lower Bounds for Arithmetic Circuits, STOC'08) is aimed at $VP\neq VNP$ (and not directly $P\neq NP$), but it might be close enough for the OP: A polynomial-mapping $f:\mathbb F^n \to \mathbb F^m$ is $(s, r)$-elusive, if for every polynomial-mapping $Γ : \mathbb F^s → \mathbb F^m$ of degree $r$, Image($f$)...

9

Is there a particular style of problem you are looking for, or anything related to a hereditary graph property? Two common types of problems would be (1) recognition: does a given $G$ have the hereditary property? or (2) find the largest (induced or not) subgraph $H$ in $G$ having the hereditary property. As I'm sure you are familiar, (2) is NP-complete (...

9

Just a joke: after thinking about the "SAT gravitational pull" in the Scott Aaronson's nice answer, another metaphore came to my mind: the 3-SAT 2-SAT sandwich ! ... but I don't know if the sandwich can be filled with natural ingredients (however I found that it could be filled with some $(2 + \frac{(\log n)^k}{n^2})$-SAT sauce [1] if the Exponential-Time ...

9

Given a CSP where all constraints have arity at most $q$ we want to distinguish between the case where everything is satisfiable and the case where at most $1/2^q$ fraction of the constraints are satisfiable, in polynomial time. Here is how this can be done. First, all predicates used in the CSP must have at least one satisfying assignment (otherwise we ...

9

there is a somewhat side/more recently studied field of complexity called graph complexity that studies how larger graphs are built out of smaller graphs using AND and OR operations of edges. Jukna has a nice survey. in particular using units of "star graphs" there is a key theorem, see p20 remark 1.18 (the theorem is technically stronger than below and ...

9

The answer here seems to imply there is a more general result. For this particular case, here is a self contained way to reduce the problem to maximum weight perfect matching. Assume $k$ is even. Given $G=(L\cup R, E)$, we construct a new graph $G'=(V',E')$ as follows, let $|R|=n$. Add vertices in $R$ to $V'$. For each vertex $v \in L$, add vertices $v_1,... 9 Mihalis Yannakakis has shown that the traveling salesman problem cannot be solved in polynomial time by using a symmetric linear program. See the paper Expressing combinatorial optimization problems by Linear Programs, by Yannakakis. This result was improved recently by Fiorini, Massar, Pokutta, Tiwary, and De Wolf to drop the "symmetric" requirement in ... 9 Adding to Sasha's answer. Roughly speaking, BBH posits that every property of functions that is hard to decide with only query access to the function (black box access) is also hard to decide when you're given a circuit for the function. The paper: https://eccc.weizmann.ac.il/report/2017/109/ shows that certain counterexamples to BBH would refute a non-... 8 The class of functions computable by formulas of polynomial size is equivalent to the (nonuniform) class$\mathsf{NC}^1$of functions computable by (bounded fanin/fanout) circuits of logarithmic depth. Proving the two implications is a nice exercise. In one direction, you can recursively "untangle" each level of a circuit by creating copies of gates. This ... 8 Here is a result from descriptive complexity theory:$P \ne NP$if and only if some second order property is not expressible using first order logic plus least fixed point. Reference: Immerman, Languages that capture complexity classes 8 As proved in this paper: http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/users/wwwb/cgi-bin/tr-get.cgi/1991/CS/CS0699.revised.pdf If$P \neq NP$can be shown to be independent of Peano Arithmetic, then NP has extremely-close-to-polynomial deterministic time upper bounds. In particular, in such a case, there is a$DTIME(n^{log^*(n)})\$ algorithm that computes SAT correctly on ...

Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible