Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
Kaveh
  • 21.8k
  • 8
  • 84
  • 185
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackCSTheory/status/184832177299660802
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
aelguindy
  • 951
  • 7
  • 15

One usually thinks about approximating solutions (with guarantees) to NP-hard problems. Is there any research going on in approximating problems already known to be in P? This might be a good idea for several reasons. Off the top of my head, an approximation algorithm may run with a much lower complexity (or even a much smaller constant), might use less space or might be much better parallelizable.

Also, schemes that provide time/accuracy tradeoffs (FPTAS's and PTAS's) might be very attractive for problems in P with lower bounds that are unacceptable on large inputs.

TwoThree questions: is there anything that I'm missing that makes this obviously a bad idea? Is there research going on in developing a theory of these algorithms? If not, at least, is anyone familiar with individual examples of such algorithms?

One usually thinks about approximating solutions (with guarantees) to NP-hard problems. Is there any research going on in approximating problems already known to be in P? This might be a good idea for several reasons. Off the top of my head, an approximation algorithm may run with a much lower complexity (or even a much smaller constant), might use less space or might be much better parallelizable.

Also, schemes that provide time/accuracy tradeoffs (FPTAS's and PTAS's) might be very attractive for problems in P with lower bounds that are unacceptable on large inputs.

Two questions: is there anything that I'm missing that makes this obviously a bad idea? Is there research going on in developing a theory of these algorithms? If not, at least, is anyone familiar with individual examples of such algorithms?

One usually thinks about approximating solutions (with guarantees) to NP-hard problems. Is there any research going on in approximating problems already known to be in P? This might be a good idea for several reasons. Off the top of my head, an approximation algorithm may run with a much lower complexity (or even a much smaller constant), might use less space or might be much better parallelizable.

Also, schemes that provide time/accuracy tradeoffs (FPTAS's and PTAS's) might be very attractive for problems in P with lower bounds that are unacceptable on large inputs.

Three questions: is there anything that I'm missing that makes this obviously a bad idea? Is there research going on in developing a theory of these algorithms? If not, at least, is anyone familiar with individual examples of such algorithms?

Source Link
aelguindy
  • 951
  • 7
  • 15

Approximation algorithms for problems in P

One usually thinks about approximating solutions (with guarantees) to NP-hard problems. Is there any research going on in approximating problems already known to be in P? This might be a good idea for several reasons. Off the top of my head, an approximation algorithm may run with a much lower complexity (or even a much smaller constant), might use less space or might be much better parallelizable.

Also, schemes that provide time/accuracy tradeoffs (FPTAS's and PTAS's) might be very attractive for problems in P with lower bounds that are unacceptable on large inputs.

Two questions: is there anything that I'm missing that makes this obviously a bad idea? Is there research going on in developing a theory of these algorithms? If not, at least, is anyone familiar with individual examples of such algorithms?