Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with dependent-type
Search options not deleted
user 15733
An overlapping feature of type theory and type systems.
1
vote
1
answer
178
views
First-order multi arity functions in dependent type?
(cross posted from Reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/dependent_types/comments/b1ts8b/firstorder_multi_arity_functions_in_dependent_type/?
Take Agda for example, functions of multi arity is "encoded" as …
- 347
6
votes
1
answer
314
views
What will go wrong if a recursive record type has a negative eta rule?
In the context of Agda like dependent type theory:
This short paper https://jesper.sikanda.be/files/vectors-are-records-too.pdf says some inductive type can be seen as records, for example Vector of …
- 347
1
vote
1
answer
205
views
Definitional equality of recursive function definition by "infinite unfolding"
The context is checking definitional equality in dependent type theory implementations.
Consider in Coq
Fixpoint predd(a: nat): nat :=
match a with
| O => O
| S b => predd(b)
end.
Fixpoi …
- 347
13
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Is compiler for dependent type much harder than an intepreter?
I have been learning something about implementing dependent types, like this tutorial, but most of them is implementing interpreters. My question is, it seems that implementing a compiler for dependen …
- 347
3
votes
1
answer
283
views
Model foreign keys as dependent types?
A database consists a list of tables. For example you have a table of Worker and a table of Project where each project needs a worker, you might express it in ordinary PLs as this:
type Worker = { nam …
- 347