Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with hypercomputation
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 186
19
votes
Accepted
Why has hypercomputation research died down?
Also see the criticisms made against the claim that hyper-computation is something new:
Martin Davis, "Why there is no such discipline as hypercomputation", 2006. … Martin Davis, "The Myth of Hypercomputation", in "Alan Turing: Life and Legacy of a Great Thinker", 2004. …
- 21.8k