Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with sat
Search options not deleted
user 6242
SAT stands for the Boolean satisfiability problem.
18
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Ranking the Difficulty of NP Hard Problems in Practice
The intuition is that one problem P1 can be expected to be harder than P2 if its 3-SAT encoding is nearer R (which is known to be near 4.2). … There are a number of counter arguments, among them:
The Phase Transition of 3-SAT CNF formula applies to random formulae. …
- 359
16
votes
Direct SAT to 3-SAT reduction
Again, the only way to satisfy both of these clauses is to have at least one of z1 and z2 be true, thus satisfying C
If the clause has three literals, C={z1, z2, z3}, just copy C into the 3-SAT instance …
- 5,792
2
votes
How the Number of Clauses Change the Complexity of Worst Case k-SAT ?
I think that your question is already solved in On the Complexity of K-SAT by Russell Impagliazzo and Ramamohan Paturi.
And the answer, as anticipated by JeffE is yes. …
