# What is the recognition complexity of k-uniform k-partite hypergraphs? [duplicate]

This question already has an answer here:

We can easily recognize bipartite graphs, but I surprisingly couldn't find anything on the recognition complexity of 3-uniform tripartite hypergraphs, though I'm sure this has been studied. It's also in P, right? What about larger $k$?

## marked as duplicate by domotorp, Community♦Jun 19 '16 at 21:13

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

• What do you mean by uniform? – Erfan Khaniki Jun 19 '16 at 18:11
• @Erfan: oops, I forgot to write hyper, thx. – domotorp Jun 19 '16 at 18:19
• Testing whether a graph is tripartite is already NP-hard, and isn't a graph tripartite iff the hypergraph constructed by adding a fresh vertex to each edge is also tripartite? (Clearly a tripartition of the graph gives one of the hypergraph by choosing the available part for the fresh vertices, and conversely a tripartition of the hypergraph gives one of the graph.) Am I missing something? – a3nm Jun 19 '16 at 20:56
• @a3nm: Looks pretty convincing! (typo: bip should be trip) – domotorp Jun 19 '16 at 20:59
• @domotorp: Fixed the typo and posted as an answer. – a3nm Jun 19 '16 at 21:04

## 1 Answer

The problem is NP-hard for $k=3$ already.

Indeed, testing if a graph is tripartite (i.e., there exists a partition $V_1 \sqcup V_2 \sqcup V_3$ of its vertex set $V$ such that each edge is between two different subsets) is cleary NP-hard, as it is exactly equivalent to $3$-coloring.

Now, I reduce the problem of the question to that problem. Given a graph $G$, construct the 3-uniform hypergraph $H$ by adding to each edge $e = \{v_1, v_2\}$ a fresh vertex $v_e$. I claim that $H$ is tripartite iff $G$ is. Indeed, a tripartition of $H$ clearly gives a tripartition of $G$. Conversely, given a tripartition of $G$, we can construct a tripartition of $H$ by assigning each fresh vertex $v_e$ to the one available class of the partition. The reduction is obviously PTIME.

• Incredible, but just know I've noticed the first related question TCS offers on the right is exactly the same as mine and it is also answered, even a solution practically identical to yours is there! – domotorp Jun 19 '16 at 21:06
• @Ricky: Are you sure? See also this answer: cstheory.stackexchange.com/a/353/419 – domotorp Jun 20 '16 at 3:42
• @domotorp : ​ Oh, I guess this answer only describes its reduction as the wrong direction, rather than actually giving a reduction in the wrong direction. ​ ​ ​ ​ – user6973 Jun 20 '16 at 3:46