Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with advice-and-nonuniformity
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 1812
Questions about advice and nonuniformity
1
vote
0
answers
34
views
On $PP$ and derandomization
$PP\subseteq P/poly\implies PP=\Sigma_2\cap\Pi_2$ and $EXP\subseteq P/Poly\implies EXP=PP$ $=CH=MA$.
If $PP\subseteq P/poly$ then can $PP=\Sigma_2\cap\Pi_2=MA$ hold? Are there difficulties showing t …
- 13.3k
0
votes
1
answer
195
views
What do stronger circuit lower bounds give in terms of derandomization?
We have $EXP\not\subseteq P/poly\implies BPP\subseteq io-DTIME(2^{n^\epsilon})$ at every $\epsilon>0$.
This is essentially $DTIME(2^{O(n)})\not\subseteq P/poly\implies BPP\subseteq io-DTIME(2^{n^\eps …
- 13.3k
1
vote
0
answers
172
views
Interlaced uniform versus non-uniform hierarchy
Denote $\mathsf{uniform}$ class with prefix $\mathsf{u}$ and $\mathsf{non}$-$\mathsf{uniform}$ class with prefix $\mathsf{nu}$.
In following some non-trivial standard notion of uniformity (like $\mat …
- 13.3k